Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600573
Original file (ND0600573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND06-00573

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060322 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070111 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was 4-1 that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct .

PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues
Equity: Youth and immaturity.
Equity: Post-service.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 for period under review
Applicant’s DD Form 214 for discharge on January 4, 2006 (Army/ARNGUS)
 Certificate of Training for Combat Lifesaver Course 12 - 1 5 July 2005
 Army Achievement Medal Certificate
Letter of Appreciation, dtd February 16, 2006
Letter of Appreciation, dtd February 17, 2006
Reference Letter from D_ S_ (Applicant’s mother), dated January 27, 2006
 Reference Letter from W_ J_ S_ (Applicant’s father), dated January 27, 2006 (2 pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19950815 - 19950912       COG
          Active: None

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19950913              Date of Discharge: 19970314

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 1 0 6 0 2 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 2 4 day s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 1 9

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 32

Highest Rate: SA

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3 .0 ( 1 )              Behavior: 3 .0 ( 1 )                 OTA: 3 .00

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960229:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violation or failure to obey other lawful written order.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 4 months), restricted to NAVSUBSCOL for 7 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

960229:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, violation or failure to obey other lawful written order.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
970130 :  Mental Health Consultation Report for evaluation on 970116:
         AXIS I: No Diagnosis or Condition
          AXIS II: Anti social Personality Disorder (severe)
         History of present illness : …Command’s medical noted he had a history of suicidal ideation for the past 10 months.
         Recommendation: The patient was educated regarding his diagnosis and disposition. Patient indicated an understanding the same. The patient is fit for full duty to be available for this provider’s strong recommendation for expeditious administrative separation IAW NAVMILPERSMAN 3620225. The member is not considered to be mentally ill, (no medically boardable conditions), but manifest a long standing disorder of character and behavior which is of such severity as to render this individual unsuitable for continued military service in the U.S. Navy. Although not currently considered suicidal or homicidal, this member is judged to represent a risk to self or others if retained on active duty, especially in view of his history of suicidal or homicidal ideation.

970222:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Going from his appointed place of duty at 0700, 961217, to wit: Fire Watch, Sponsor 7, USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64); going from his appointed place of duty at 1400, 961218, to wit: Fire Watch, Sponsor 7, USS CONSTELLATION ( CV-64) ; going from his appointed place of duty at 1100, 991219, to wit: Fire Watch, Sponsor 7, USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64); unauthorized absence from unit at 1300, 9701 13 until 0700, 970115; unauthorized absence from unit at 0800, 970121 until 0700, 970131; unauthorized absence from unit at 1400, 970131 until 0700, 970210 .
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 4 00 .0 0 pay per month for 1 month (suspended for 6 months) , restriction and extra duty for 3 0 days, reduction to E- 1 (suspended for 6 months) . No indication of appeal in the record.
970226 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by nonjudicial punishments of 9 6 0229 and 970221; convenience of the government on the basis of personality disorder as evidenced by the Mental Health Consultation Report of 970116 conducted by the Mental Health Unit, Base Medical Center, Naval Air Station, North Island.

970226 :  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to submit statements on own behalf either verbally or in writing and the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

970304:  Applicant submitted condition al waiver request for g eneral d ischarge from the naval service. Letter indicated Applicant did not consult with legal counsel.

970307:  Commanding Officer directed the Applicant's general (under honorable conditions) discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

970430 :  Commanding Officer forwarded the administrative discharge package to CNP . Commanding Officer’s comments : “SA S_’s (Applicant) behavior is contrary to good order and discipline and indicative of his disregard for rules and regulations. Based on the available facts in this case, I separated SA S_ on 14 March 1997 from the Naval service with a General Discharge.”

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19970314 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions or general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a retention warning and nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 and 92 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ, failure to obey an order/regulation, is the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his youth and immaturity. While he may feel that his immaturity was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The Applicant contends that his discharge should be changed due to his post-service accomplishments in the Tennessee Army National Guard. There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. After a complete review of the entire record, including the Applicant’s honorable and noteworthy service in the National Guard, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge. Should the Applicant elect to request a perusal appearance hearing, the Board recommends the Applicant’s proof of post-service conduct be more comprehensive. Additional documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. Additionally, for the edification of the Applicant, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 14, effective 03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, failure to obey lawful order/regulation .
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500502

    Original file (ND0500502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to general/under honorable conditions. Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 39 Highest Rate: FN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.00 (1) Behavior: 3.00 (1) OTA: 3.00 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, AFEM Days of Unauthorized Absence: 17 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00081

    Original file (ND02-00081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00081 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011011, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 920207: USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00134

    Original file (ND00-00134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :891026: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement on 16Oct89, violation of UCMJ Article 134: Obstructing justice on 16Oct96. No indication of appeal in the record.910508: USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by larceny of car audio equipment of a value of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00462

    Original file (ND04-00462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00462 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040121. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501057

    Original file (ND0501057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    971028: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had not committed misconduct due to drug abuse and found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended general (under honorable conditions) discharge, suspended for 12 months.980123: Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0645 on 980123.980128: Drug and Alcohol Abuse...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601070

    Original file (ND0601070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-ACAN, USNND06-01070Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060814Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCT - Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN3630620Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64)Applicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to:none requestedCharacterization change to:HonorableReview Requested:Representation: Issues (as summarized by NDRB): 1. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00012

    Original file (ND01-00012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870427: Vacate suspended forfeiture and reduction awarded at CO's NJP of 4Feb87 due to continued misconduct.870427: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0730, 7Apr87 to 0730, 11Apr87 (4 days/surrendered). No indication of appeal in the record.870621: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs):Specification 1: Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 2100, 1Jun87. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (4 specs): Specification 1:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01015

    Original file (ND00-01015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $319 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.860121: Retention Warning from USS INDEPENDENCE (CV-62): Advised of deficiency (Discreditable involvement with military authorities, e.g. unauthorized absence. The Board does not have the authority to change a discharge to a medical discharge, nor does the Board have an obligation to change the applicant’s discharge in order to allow him to go back...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500213

    Original file (ND0500213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 890113: Applicant briefed on Navy’s policy of drug and alcohol abuse.890701: Applicant signed USN Drug Abuse Statement of Understanding. 910913: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00185

    Original file (ND02-00185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00185 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After my discharge we were divorced.2.