Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00582
Original file (ND03-00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USNR
Docket No. ND03-00582

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030221. The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to “general but not honorable my offenses were not honorable.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040128. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character and narrative reason of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. I do not have any issues with my discharge because it does favorer the offenses. My issues is that I miss the military and the type of discharge and reenlistment code I received prevents me from reentering the military, so I’m asking for a change of discharge and an upgrade of my reenlistment code, so that I may reenter the military.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant dated January 2, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910820               Date of Discharge: 931014

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 07 27
         Inactive: 00 05 13

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: AA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.10 (2)    Behavior: 2.70 (2)                OTA: 3.20

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 14

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920203:  Ordered to active duty for 24 months under the Fireman Apprenticeship program.

920627:  UA from 1530, 920627, surrendered onboard at 0700, 920628 (15 hours/30 minutes).

920719:  Retention Warning from [USS AMERICA (CV-66)]: Advised of deficiency (Misconduct by evidence of your non-judicial punishment of 920819 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, Unauthorized absence from 0630 to 0645, 920710; and 0700 to 0745, 920726; violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Wrongfully and falsely alter a military identification card on 920807 ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

920819:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0630 to 0645, 920710; and 0700 to 0745, 920726; violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Wrongfully and falsely alter a military identification card on 920807.
         Award: Correctional Custody for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

921105:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Failed to go at time prescribed to his appointed place of duty at 0630, 921005.
Award: Forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 20 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
930501:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0745, 930329 to 0630, 930412 (14 days/S).
Award: Forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 20 days, reduction to E-1 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
930515:  Punishment of RIR to E-1 suspended at CO’s NJP of 930501 vacated this date due to continued misconduct.

930515:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from his appointed place of duty, to wit: Restricted Men’s Muster at 1430, 930505; 0630, 930508; and 2130, 930508.
         Award: Forfeiture of $150.00 pay per month for 1 month, 3 days confinement on bread and water. No indication of appeal in the record.

930626:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Willful dereliction of duty on 930608.
         Award: Forfeiture of $407.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

930716:  USS AMERICA (CV-66) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by all non-judicial punishments under the UCMJ in your current enlistment.
930716:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
930722:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

930728:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19931014 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The Applicant’s discharge characterization and narrative reason for separation accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, to permit reenlistment, or for good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00462

    Original file (ND04-00462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00462 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040121. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00127

    Original file (ND99-00127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. No indication of appeal in the record.830721: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (2 specs): Disobeying a lawful order on 30Jun83 and 1Jul83 Award: Restriction and extra duty for 15 days, reduction to ENFA. 850525: Applicant to unauthorized absence, 1430, 85May25.850529: Applicant from unauthorized absence 2230, 86May29...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01023

    Original file (ND02-01023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01023 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020711, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.920710: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from unit from 920526 to 920615 (20 days/S); violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missed ship's movement on 920527. The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01219

    Original file (ND02-01219.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Vacate previous award of forfeiture of $372.00 for 1 month awarded at CO's NJP of 860327 and correctional custody for 30 days. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 880415 under honorable conditions (general) for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Applicant did not provide any verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00051

    Original file (ND00-00051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. P: Level II treatment recommended.911125: Medical: Applicant reinterviewed and still concluded applicant is abusive of ETOH not dependent at this time. 920807: Commanding officer recommended discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a Pattern of Misconduct,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00051

    Original file (ND02-00051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.900802: Retention Warning from USS SEATTLE (AOE-3): Advised of deficiency (Misconduct due to violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from unit for 12 days and violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missing ship's movement. No indication of appeal in the record.920723: Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at CO's NJP dated 18Jun92 due to continued misconduct.920723: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700, 13Jul92 to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00128

    Original file (ND00-00128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    900412: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to commission of serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions and further recommended that the discharge not be suspended. Accordingly, I concur with the Board's recommendation that ABFAA (Applicant) be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00262

    Original file (ND03-00262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also my division officer recommended retention instead of separation.”Applicant marked the box "I HAVE LISTED ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THIS APPLICATION." At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Therefore, no relief will be granted.The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01015

    Original file (ND00-01015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $319 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.860121: Retention Warning from USS INDEPENDENCE (CV-62): Advised of deficiency (Discreditable involvement with military authorities, e.g. unauthorized absence. The Board does not have the authority to change a discharge to a medical discharge, nor does the Board have an obligation to change the applicant’s discharge in order to allow him to go back...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00176

    Original file (ND99-00176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unauthorized absence1245, 7Apr84.840424: Substance Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, less than monthly, Jan80-Mar84, ashore off duty, urinalysis. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue 1 of post-service clemency, the Board found that the applicant’s post-service conduct was not sufficient to warrant an upgrade. The...