Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01295
Original file (MD03-01295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01295

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030724. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040504. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I, (Applicant) due believe that my discharge should be upgraded due to I was involuntarily separated from the USMC & that I had few problems while in the Marine Corps that were service related, as of job wise. I am seeking to get my full benefits, which I have contributed too, while serving my country. Also a return to active duty is a possible venue after I seek my education.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970407 - 970518  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970519               Date of Discharge: 990721

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 02 03 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 62

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NMF*                          Conduct: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NUC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 15

*No Marks Found in the service record

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980309:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Underage drinking and allowing another Marine to drive while intoxicated.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

990324:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement with spousal abuse, lack of integrity and poor judgment. IHCA for spousal abuse and CO ordered Applicant to move into barracks and have no contact with spouse.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
990427:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Lack of discipline displayed over the last 6 months. On countless occasions been late for PT formations, checking in for duty and other situations.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
990428:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: UA place of duty from 0645-0710, 990330.
Specification 2: UA from 990331 to 990414 while IHCA for conviction for domestic violence.
Awarded forfeiture of $269.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days (restriction and one months forfeiture suspended for 6 months). Not appealed.
990513:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Conviction and jail term for criminal domestic violence. Sentenced to 29 days in jail. Released on 990414 after 15 days IHCA.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
990621:  Charges referred to Summary Court-Martial.
 Charge I: Violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement to 1 st Sgt J_.
Charge II: Violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Break restriction on 990522.
990712:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by a nonjudicial punishment and four adverse page 11 entries.
990712:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
990712:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was a nonjudicial punishment and four adverse page 11 entries.

990720:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

990720:  GCMCA [CG, MCRD/ERR, PISC] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19990721 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. T he Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on one occasion and adverse counseling entries on other occasions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable or under honorable characterization of service. An upgrade is inappropriate. Relief denied.

The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans’ benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00759

    Original file (MD00-00759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00759 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000523, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION [Driving a vehicle without proper registration, insurance and disregarding instruction to report to my Company First Sergeant the following day] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued980630: NJP...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01138

    Original file (MD02-01138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant, dated May 22, 2002Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960508 - 961229 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961230 Date of Discharge: 001130...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00658

    Original file (MD99-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s counsel alleges that the discharge was excessive for her misconduct and that she signed her right away for counsel. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00198

    Original file (MD04-00198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00198 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031117. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: did disobey a lawful order from 1stSgt T_.Awd red to E-1 and 45 days restriction and extra duties.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00753

    Original file (MD04-00753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.021209: Applicant requested to waive the administrative discharge board on the condition that he receive a general discharge.030122: CG, III MEF denied Applicant’s conditional waiver of the administrative discharge board.030124: Counseled for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01137

    Original file (MD02-01137.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01137 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020809, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940623 - 950312 COG Period of Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00882

    Original file (MD99-00882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Not appealed.940928: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.940928: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.940929: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00241

    Original file (MD03-00241.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you for your consideration.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 870327 - 870920 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 870921 Date of Discharge: 901015 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 00 25 Inactive: None Chronological...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00818

    Original file (MD00-00818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    900221: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134:Specification: Make 14 checks for a total of $1741.73, without sufficient funds to cover the checks. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01114

    Original file (MD99-01114.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01114 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990812, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to secretarial authority. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.840326: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121 (2 specs):Specification 1: During the following times and on the following dates make...