Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00241
Original file (MD03-00241.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00241

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20021121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031010. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 “1. I wish an upgrade to rejoin active duty service. I currently have been in the U.S. Army National Guard for the past 2 1/2 years. I haven’t been in any trouble. I want to serve my country in active duty status. I’ve learned from my mistakes and have matured. I would love a second chance to finish my career active duty. I have a wife and seven year old daughter and I love the military. Please give me another chance I will not let the Board or my country down again. Thank you for your consideration.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                870327 - 870920  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870921               Date of Discharge: 901015

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 00 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 34

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (10)                      Conduct: 3.9 (10)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: OSR, LoA (2)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :
880203:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey BnO 11101.5B by smoking in his rack.
 Awarded forfeiture of $172.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Not appealed.
881209:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Reporting late to appointed place of duty.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
900216:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Failure to go to appointed place of duty, to wit: 3dTkBn armory.
 Awarded forfeiture of $207.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Not appealed.
900216:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Office hours dated 900216.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
900501:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey BnO 11103.1F by having liquor in his BEQ room.
 Awarded forfeiture of $207.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Not appealed.
900501:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Office hours dated 900501 for violation of Art 92, UCMJ by having beer in the bks. BnO 11103.1F.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

900613:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use a Schedule I controlled substance, to wit: THC.
 Awarded reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days. Not appealed.

 900613:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Bn Cmdr Office hours for violation of Art 112a (THC).] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

900713:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92.
         Specification 1: Operate a vehicle aboard MCAGCC while on base driving restriction.
         Specification 2: Have two women in his BEQ room while on Battalion Restriction.
 Awarded reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $300.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 30 days. Not appealed.
900713:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Bn Cmdr Office hours for violation of Art 92 and 134, two counts of each article.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
900905:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by his failure to conform to the standards of the Marine Corps.
900906:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

900907:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was the Applicant’s failure to conform to the standards of the Marine Corps.

900907:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

900911:  GCMCA [CG, MCAGCC] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19901015 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.








Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence: Article 92, failure to obey a lawful order; Article 112a, illegal use of drugs; Article 134, break restriction.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00992

    Original file (MD00-00992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued981026: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:Specification: Failed to obey BnO 1700.1F by consuming alcohol while being under the legal age to do so on 2015, 12Oct98.Awarded forfeiture of $519.00 per month for 2 months. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00399

    Original file (MD03-00399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00399 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030109. “I A_ A_, was discharged from the Marine Corps, Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for smoking marijuana. Due to your continued misconduct, disregard for military authority and failure to complete Level III treatment, I have determined that you do not possess potential for further service and, accordingly, your retention is not warranted.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00562

    Original file (MD02-00562.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00562 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020312, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant dated December 16, 2001Copy of DD Form 214Thirty-one pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00822

    Original file (MD01-00822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890829: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0701, 18Aug89 to 0645, 21Aug89 (2 days). The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. The applicant did not provide any documentation to warrant an...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00750

    Original file (MD01-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00750 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010507, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00198

    Original file (MD04-00198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00198 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031117. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: did disobey a lawful order from 1stSgt T_.Awd red to E-1 and 45 days restriction and extra duties.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00995

    Original file (MD01-00995.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Copy of DD Form 215 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 861208 - 871004 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 871005 Date of Discharge: 930915 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 05 11 11 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 19 Years...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00408

    Original file (MD01-00408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PVT, USMC Docket No. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (failure to obey an order, or regulation), Article 123 (forgery), or Article 107 (false official statement).

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00986

    Original file (MD02-00986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Its been 12 years roughly since I have been discharged with an other than honorable discharge without my last qualification on the rifle range wasn't on my DD214 and neither did I receive my accrued days of leave time that was at least 2 1/2 months worth. This is not only irresponsible but a blatant disregard for military authority by failing to comply with a direct order. 900831: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01483

    Original file (MD03-01483.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01483 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030909. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :950127: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 0700, 950110 to 2030, 950119.Awarded forfeiture of $223.00 (suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duties for 14 days.