Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01237
Original file (MD02-01237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCPL, USMC
Docket No. MD02-01237

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020828, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030522. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. My discharge was inequitable because all charges were dismissed and withdrawn, then I was put on a competency Review board which consisted of all the officers from my Battalion. I believe that I was treated unfairly by the board and that my character witnesses statements were not taken into consideration to determine that I was indeed professionally competent as a Sergeant in the United States Marine Corps. All supporting documents are attached.
Applicant stated on DD Form 293 that additional issues were attached. None were found.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Thirty-seven pages from Applicant’s service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                960930 - 961113  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 961114               Date of Discharge: 001031

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 11 18
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 48

 Highest Rank: Sgt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

One Fitness Report was available for review.

 Proficiency: 4.6 (Unknown)                         Conduct: 4.6 (Unknown)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge (3d), Pistol Sharpshooter Badge, GCM, SSDR, MUC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960708:  Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
000314:  NAVDRUGLAB San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 00308, tested positive for amphetamine, methamphetamine.

000707:  Commanding Officer directed pending charge withdrawn and dismissed. The charge and specification will be disposed of by administrative action.

000818:  Applicant refused Medical evaluation for drug abuse.

000928:  Commanding Officer directed Applicant’s reduction to Corporal as a result of a Competency Review Board.
001005:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable
conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was violation of the UCMJ Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
Undated:         Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
001017:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the discharge.
0010xx:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

0010xx:  GCMCA [Commander, 1 st FSSG] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 001031 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Disciplinary action is not necessary to process a Marine for administrative separation for drug abuse. Relief denied.

 The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Despite the allegations made by the Applicant concerning his Competency Review Board, no such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00805

    Original file (MD01-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The applicant used illegal drugs. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00080

    Original file (MD04-00080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00080 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031014. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 980624 - 980920 COG...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00135

    Original file (MD04-00135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Issue 5: “Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application._______________________________________________________________________In accordance with 32...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00974

    Original file (MD02-00974.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    010810: Commanding Officer, Support Battalion, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to illegal use of drugs. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Applicant contends that, as a matter of equity, his drug use was the only incident in an otherwise honorable period of 61 months of service. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01151

    Original file (MD03-01151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. 980428: GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00533

    Original file (MD03-00533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20001214, as stated by the Applicant, under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01093

    Original file (MD99-01093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The applicant did not provide any documentation of good character or conduct, which would warrant an upgrade to his discharge. The applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, to discuss his post-service accomplishments,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00340

    Original file (MD02-00340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00340 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I strongly recommend that LCpl (applicant) be discharged from the Marine Corps IAW P5300.12 Paragraph 2203.2, Change 4, and I further recommend that the characterization of discharge be Other Than Honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00856

    Original file (MD01-00856.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00856 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010612, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 970205 - 001030 COG Period of Service Under...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01117

    Original file (MD99-01117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted the following issue: post-service conduct(EQUITY ISSUE) This former member requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application. The applicant provided letters of recommendation as documentation of his post-service. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.