Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00340
Original file (MD02-00340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00340

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020912. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as submitted

Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as Block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Character reference from Brigadier General dated December 13, 2001 (2 copies)
Statement from applicant dated December 27, 2001
Copy of appointment to Corporal dated January 1, 1992 (2 copies)
Copy of District Nineteen's Republican Newsletter dated October 2001
Copy of newspaper articles from the Arizona State Monitor
Copy of two cartoons
Copy of applicant's DD Form 214
Copy of military education dated June 29, 1992

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                871204 - 880913  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880914               Date of Discharge: 921125

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 02 12
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 57

 Highest Rank: Cpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.6 (16)             Conduct: 4.4 (16)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, NDSM, GCM, NUC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS /Misconduct-Drug abuse (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

871123:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
880914:  Initial enlistment contract documented admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Enlistment waiver was granted.

920526:  NAVDRUGLAB, Oakland, CA reports applicant's urine sample, received 920518, tested positive for THC.
920624:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a:
 Specification: Wrongful use and possession of marijuana.
Awarded forfeiture of $250.00 per month for 1 month, extra duties for 45 days, reduction to LCpl. Not appealed.
920731:  NAVDRUGLAB, Oakland, CA reports applicant's urine sample, received 920727, tested positive for cocaine.

920810:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a positive test for THC (marijuana) as verified by NAVDRUGLAB Oakland, CA message dated 261600Z May 92.
920813:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
920820:  Commanding Officer, Marine All Weather Fighter Attack Squadron 225, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was wrongful use, possession, etc., of a controlled substance. Commanding Officer’s comments: LCpl (applicant) was a good Marine whose conscious decision to use drugs is unacceptable. I strongly recommend that LCpl (applicant) be discharged from the Marine Corps IAW P5300.12 Paragraph 2203.2, Change 4, and I further recommend that the characterization of discharge be Other Than Honorable.

 920922:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

921026:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

921027:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 921125 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. There is credible evidence in the record that the applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The Board agrees that the applicant had good evaluations and a solid record of performance during his tenure, but his performance prior to the drug abuse does not mitigate his use of illegal drugs. Relief denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

In the applicant’s letter, he requests a change to his reenlistment code. The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.
The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00032

    Original file (MD00-00032.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 931122 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue, the Board found this to be non-decisional. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00251

    Original file (MD00-00251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Character of discharge is inequitable and to severe in view of applicant's good military record, and fact that applicant had only one incident of drug use although tested many times. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00853

    Original file (MD01-00853.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the applicant's service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. It is in the best interests of the Marine Corps to separate SNM ASAP.”920427: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a General characterization of service by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by positive urinalysis for cocaine.920429: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00716

    Original file (MD04-00716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 921130 - 930201 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930202 Date of Discharge: 951222 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 10 21 Inactive: None PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00819

    Original file (MD00-00819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    891218: Applicant removed from the urinalysis surveillance program.900301: Applicant completed Level III in-patient treatment from 900116-900301 at Naval Alcohol/Drug Rehabilitation Center.900328: Applicant placed on urinalysis surveillance program after being evaluated by the Joint Drug and Alcohol Counseling Center.900524: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00805

    Original file (MD01-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The applicant used illegal drugs. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV).

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00443

    Original file (MD99-00443.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the incident I have completed a 12 month drug & alcohol program and have had no further occurances of the incident. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 901128 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00592

    Original file (MD99-00592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PVT, USMCR Docket No. MD99-00592 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990325, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00471

    Original file (MD00-00471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Statement from applicant, dated February 3, 2000 Character reference from manager of Pep Boys Copy of applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC 840820 - 880712 HON Inactive: USMCR(J) 831031 - 840819 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 880713 Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00738

    Original file (MD02-00738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant's two positive tests for drug use and subsequent summary court-martial warranted processing for administrative separation under other than honorable conditions. Additional evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities are other examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief under post-service conduct. Relief...