Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00533
Original file (MD03-00533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00533

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030210. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040205. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I am requesting an upgrade of my discharge so I will qualify for medical assistance. It is of the utmost importance that you consider the upgrade.”

 Documentation
Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                980709 - 981004  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 981005               Date of Discharge: 001116*

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 01 12
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 58

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1 (7)                       Conduct: 4.0 (7)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*Cannot verify date – DD Form 214 not contained in service record book and Applicant did not provide a copy, as requested by the Board.

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980709:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

990504:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 by being absent without authorization from Physical Training at 0600 on 990501. Necessary corrective actions explained. Sources of assistance identified. Disciplinary and administrative discharge warnings issued.
990520:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: On or about 0546, 990511, absent himself from his unit, to wit: AMS1, MATSG, NATTC, NAS Pensacola, FL and remain so absent until on or about 0815, 990511.
Awarded forfeiture of $479.00 pay per month for 1 month (suspended for 3 months), restriction for 20 days, reduction to E-1 (suspended for 3 months). Not appealed.
990803:  Acknowledged eligibility but not recommended for promotion to rank of Lance Corporal for the Jul/Aug 1999 promotion board because of recent NJP.

991213:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 by failing to appear on time to a scheduled uniform inspection on 11 Dec 1999. Necessary corrective actions explained. Sources of assistance identified. Disciplinary and administrative discharge warnings issued.

000816:  NAVDRUGLAB [San Diego], reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 000811, tested positive for THC (marijuana).

000925:  Naval Addictions Rehabilitation and Education Dept, Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, CA: Applicant refused medical officer’s evaluation and acknowledged that there is no Veterans Administration Hospital Addiction Treatment available in conjunction with discharge.
001017:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana.
 Awarded forfeiture of $563.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 30 days, reduction to E-2. Not appealed.
001027:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by NJP on 000816 for Art 112a and Page 11 entries on 990602 and 991213 for unauthorized absence.
001027:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

001031:  Commanding Officer, Personnel Administrative Support Detachment, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was NJP on 990602 for Article 86 and on 001017 for Art 112a and Page 11 entries on 990504 and 991213 for unauthorized absence.

001106:  Commanding Officer, Marine Aircraft Group 39, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

001113:  SJA review determined the case is legally sufficient.

001115:  GCMCA [CG, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a patter of misconduct and misconduct due to drug abuse, with the misconduct due to drug abuse as the primary basis on the DD Form 214.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20001214, as stated by the Applicant, under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining medical or other veterans’ benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00461

    Original file (ND00-00461.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was going to have my record sent to the medical board for review. 990426: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0730, 26Apr99.990504: Applicant from unauthorized absence 1045, 3May99 (7 days/surrendered).990504: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.990504: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00947

    Original file (ND02-00947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00947 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020619, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 010207: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0730 on 010207 (113 days/ surrendered).010308: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, misconduct due to civil...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00713

    Original file (MD01-00713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s first issue states: “My "other than honorable" discharge was not appropriate for the offenses I committed. I request my discharge be upgraded to General Under Honorable Conditions.” The NDRB found the applicant’s service record demonstrated a pattern of misconduct according to regulations. Relief is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00059

    Original file (ND02-00059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00059 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011002, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 001017 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01205

    Original file (ND03-01205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970109 - 970406 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970407 Date of Discharge: 990512 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 06 Inactive: None Award: Not found in service record....

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01308

    Original file (MD02-01308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01308 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020910, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00484

    Original file (ND99-00484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960216 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct was the reason the applicant was discharged. The applicant requested that the reason for his discharge be changed to “entry level separation”.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00642

    Original file (ND01-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00642 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010411, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. No indication of appeal in the record.001101: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.001101: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01083

    Original file (ND00-01083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SA, USNR Docket No. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990602 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00512

    Original file (ND99-00512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue alleges his misconduct was mitigated by a racially charged hostile work environment. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements...