DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
JBH
Docket No. NR1343-13
16 Oct 13
—
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 use 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
15 October 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were _
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your maval record and
appiicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser
42/031 dated 1 April 2013, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ay Den ,
W. DEAN PFEDRF
Executive Dixéctor
Enclosure: NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/031 dated i April 2013
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1344 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6291 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/088 dated aD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8210 13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/103 dated ————e a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3859 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March-2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/067 dated (RP @ copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable Material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10050-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosure (1).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01232-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD letter, 4050 Ser 53E/024, 27 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03819-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD memorandum 4050 SER 2000, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01309-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He was advised that based on his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00566-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have not provided a compelling reason as to why you could not or did not wait for funded orders before moving your property.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR828 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support chereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCOM letter 4050 Ser N42/067 dated 8 April 2014, a Copy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...