Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01309-02
Original file (01309-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:yrj
Docket No: 1309-02
6 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 6 August 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NSSC memorandum 4050 Ser
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

 

53F/80 of 1 July 2002, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVAL 
t*RLISLE  
BOY 7.050
MECH*NIC*B”RG  PA  

SUPPLY  SYSTEMS  
6450 

PO 

!7OS~-O78~

COMM*NO

PIKE

Y

IAL

COMMERC

AUTOVON

IN  

REPLY 

REFER 

TO

4050
Ser 
JUL  

53F/80
- 1 2002

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref

:

Encl:

Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records

Naval Supply Systems Command

(a) BCNR  memo  PAY: GLA of 13 June 02

(1)

BCNR file

In response to reference (a),

1.
Enclosure (1) is returned.

we have reviewed enclosure (1).

Our review concluded that the Transportation Management

2.
Officer (TMO),
the member in March of 01.
conversation with the  
Form 1164 (Service Order for Personal Property) was wrong. He
was advised that based on his separation orders his entitlement
to non-temporary storage would expire soon.

Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, S.C. spoke to
The member was advised during that

TM0  that the handwritten date on the DD

In accordance with the JFTR  

3.
authorized non-temporary under his separation orders until May
01.
Government for all storage costs beyond 16 May 01.
01 through 15 Jul 02 the member owes the Government $162.40 in
storage fees.

The Petty Officer is responsible for reimbursing the

(U5360-B.l),  the member was

From 16 May

Since th

4.
"control"

he has

a shipping entitlement to Anderson, S.C.
Our opinion is that the Petty Officer was aware that his

5.
entitlement under separation orders expired in May 01 and
therefore he is responsible for storage costs as stated above.
DT3m 's still

entitled to

sh

shipment is still under Government

.

Visit the NAVSUP Homo Page at 

For One Touch Supply go to 

www.navsup.navy.mii
www.navsup.navy.mivonetouch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10050-02

    Original file (10050-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosure (1).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11040-08

    Original file (11040-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The TEMADD orders further directed that she was to e-mail IAHHG@navy.mil for instructions if she had household goods (HHG) to move or to be placed in storage. time between the orders and the proceed date was fairly short, the orders were in support of a contingency operation, making arrangements for such an assignment in so short a time period is complex, and the cost of providing the relief is low as compared to the government cost for moving and Docket No. Accordingly, the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11229-07

    Original file (11229-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. 11229-07 16 Jul 08 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO we Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner will present a copy of all the ITDY orders issued and a copy of this letter to the Agency making the computations.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05163-07

    Original file (05163-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner submitted a request for an extension of entitlement to ship his household goods (HHG) at government expense incident of his transfer to the Retired List and to convert the cost of storage to the Petitioner at the government rate.2. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09631-08

    Original file (09631-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to entitle Petitioner to reimbursement of actual expenses and reimbursement of an incentive payment for a household goods move made prior to separation. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 2009 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06214-02

    Original file (06214-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: lc Docket No: 62 14-02 24 September 2002 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy FORMER MEMBER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05937-01

    Original file (05937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5937-01 6 November 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that entitlement to ship household...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11672-08

    Original file (11672-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is’ entitled to reimbursement for storage of his household goods (HHG) while on deployment to Afghanistan in support of GWOT contingency operations. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00566-10

    Original file (00566-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have not provided a compelling reason as to why you could not or did not wait for funded orders before moving your property.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13270-09

    Original file (13270-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner received an extension of the one-year period in which he is entitled to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to his transfer to the Fleet Reserve effective 31 October 2007. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...