DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 4765-11
41 Jul il
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session,- considered your application on 11 July
2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
-statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 24 Jun
11, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. The criteria for enlistment ina
higher (or advanced) paygrade is contained in COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
1130.8H. Paygrade E-2 requires satisfactory completion of 24 semester
hours or 36 quarter hours of college credit, or 1,080 classroom hours
at an accredited vocational/technical school. The 52 credits
completed at Everest College Phoenix are equivalent to 525
vocational/technical hours. This does not meet the established
criteria for either paygrade E-3 (which you requested) or paygrade
E-2. The Board noted that paygrade E-2 had been erroneously awarded
to you at the time of your enlistment. However, the Board will not
take any action to adversely affect this advancement. Accordingly,
your request for enlistment in paygrade E-3 has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such chat
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No. 4765-11
In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06808-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No, 6808-09 24 Aug 09 Dear (ARATE This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04368-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment/Reenlistment Document (DD Form 4), erroneously indicated paygrade E-3. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01199-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05383-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01970-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06016-09
The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Navy Recruiting Command's established policy requires all applicants desiring enlistment in a higher paygrade produce official transcripts prior to their ship date. Recruiters brief all applicants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04829-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. To support his application, he submitted official college transcripts showing that between December 2005 and April 2007, prior to his enlistment, he had earned 35 hours of college credit at Miami University and Morehead...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12632-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 12632-0939 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8536 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the,zburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09725-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 9725-09 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...