Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09725-09
Original file (09725-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 9725-09
5 Apr 10

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Review of your enlistment contract reveals that you voluntarily
enlisted in paygrade E-1.. You certified that no other promises or
guarantees related to your initial grade were made to you.
Additionally, review of your transcripts by the Navy Recruiting
Command education specialist has revealed that the certificate awarded
by the State of California High School was issued based solely on
equivalency testing. For enlistment purposes, this is considered a
Tier II program, not a Tier I program (High School Diploma Graduate -
HSDG). As a result, 15 of the 34 college level credits you earned
were used to qualify you for Tier I enlistment. The remaining 19
credits were not enough to meet the established criteria for
enlistment in an advanced paygrade. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished wpon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. 9725-09

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFE
ea iL

Executive D

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07144-09

    Original file (07144-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner signed and executed DD Form 4/3 acknowledging he was voluntarily enlisting in paygrade E-1, but now alleges he should have been enlisted in paygrade E-3 based on college credits earned prior to his enlistment. g. On 24 November 2008 Petitioner signed an “Advanced Paygrade Enlistment Statement of Understanding” indicating he was NOT eligible for Advanced Paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12632-09

    Original file (12632-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 12632-0939 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12202-08

    Original file (12202-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ~ record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04635-04

    Original file (04635-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of Annex A to DD Form 4 reveals that he was not guaranteed an EBCC. He is therefore not entitled to receive an EBCC. Per enclosure (1) and reference (a), Applicants with college level foreign education who have satisfactorily completed the U.S. equivalent of 45 semester hours at a college or university accredited for post secondary education, may be enlisted as an in paygrade E-3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09910-08

    Original file (09910-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ‘BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX . WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 9910-08 11 May 09 ——

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00566-03

    Original file (00566-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant must meet the applicable education requirements for at c. least one of the ratings offered in the field in which they are enlisting. GTEP applicants are guaranteed assignment to an "A" school for a rating within the field they enlisted. 31-4 GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program g. The GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program provides individuals enlisting in either the two, three or four-year obligor GENDET program guaranteed assignment to one of six homeports upon successful completion of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06789-09

    Original file (06789-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6789-09 20 Oct 09 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1430 PERS 812 of 14 September 2009, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09725-10

    Original file (09725-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06808-09

    Original file (06808-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No, 6808-09 24 Aug 09 Dear (ARATE This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01970-08

    Original file (01970-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...