DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH .
Docket No. 12632-09
5 Apr 10
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. . Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Review of your enlistment contract reveals that you voluntarily
enlisted in paygrade E-1. You certified that no other promises or
guarantees related to your initial grade were made to you.
Additionally, review of your transcripts by the Navy Recruiting
Command education specialist has revealed that DSPM 0700 Prealgebra,
and DSPM 0800 Foundation of Math II, are considered “remedial” or
“prerequisite” and are not authorized for use in determining whether
or not an applicant qualifies for advanced paygrade based on college
credits. As a result, you did not meet the minimum standard of 24
college level credits required to enlist in paygrade E-2.,
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or ether matter not previously considered by the Board, In this
regard,-—tt is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. 12632-0939
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\DDen Sp
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09725-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 9725-09 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04368-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment/Reenlistment Document (DD Form 4), erroneously indicated paygrade E-3. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04765-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable -statutes, regulations and policies. The criteria for enlistment ina higher (or advanced) paygrade is contained in COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8H. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8536 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the,zburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04635-04
A review of Annex A to DD Form 4 reveals that he was not guaranteed an EBCC. He is therefore not entitled to receive an EBCC. Per enclosure (1) and reference (a), Applicants with college level foreign education who have satisfactorily completed the U.S. equivalent of 45 semester hours at a college or university accredited for post secondary education, may be enlisted as an in paygrade E-3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06808-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No, 6808-09 24 Aug 09 Dear (ARATE This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10629-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00290-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01484-09
- A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01970-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...