Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03666-11
Original file (03666-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DCG 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 3666-11
15 December 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: FORMER soc, USNR, Saya
: NAVAL RECORD ™

 

Wee REVIEW OF

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting in effect, that his naval record
be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Navy.
Reserve on 4 November 2010.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Midboe, Mr. Hedrick, and Ms.
Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 23 November 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and

applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows: .

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner joined the Navy Reserve on 30 January 1997
after prior active service as a SEAL. On 6 August 2010
Petitioner was notified by official correspondence that he was
delinquent on his dental exam and Physical Health Assessment. He
did not respond to this correspondence. On 4 November 2010 he
was honorably discharged by reason of unsatisfactory
participation based on his inability to meet medical
requirements.

c. Petitioner contends, in effect, that he was unjustly and
illegally discharged. He states that he was out of the country
with the knowledge and permission of his unit, and was unaware

that he was being processed for separation for not responding to
correspondence concerning physical and dental examination
requirements.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concluded that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner’s record
is free of any disciplinary action, he had not missed any drills
since 1997 and has completed numerous SEAL missions. The Board
believes that the initiation of separation action was premature
and further attempts to contact Petitioner should have been made.
Accordingly, the Board concludes that Petitioner should be
reinstated as of the date of discharge. ,

-RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he
was not discharged from the Navy Reserve on 4 November 2010, and
that all information pertaining to the discharge processing be
removed from his record.

b. That he be given authorized absences for the drills he missed
during the period from 4 November 2010 to the date of
implementation of this action.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ff ,
LY Fh) 7

AMES R./EXNICIOS

 
  

   

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

W. DEAN P a
Executive Witeéctor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10018-06

    Original file (10018-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 10018-06 28 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF™ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05109-09

    Original file (05109-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Navy Reserve on 4 March 2008. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 July 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07165-09

    Original file (07165-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 CRG Docket No: 7165-09 13 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER =e Pr REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD REE (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Navy Reserve on i1 December 2007. c. That any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04582-00

    Original file (04582-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In spite of the fact that (Petitioner) was reporting for drill on the first weekend, the muster sheets for the first weekend were never annotated to show his reporting. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he 3 was not discharged on 7 November 1999 but continued to be a member of the Marine Corps Reserve; That Petitioner be further corrected to show that he was b. credited with four pay drills in December 1997 and February and June 1999 and in any other months in 1999...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11703-09

    Original file (11703-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 11703-09 18 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER SA, USNR, Sl ie eS NAVAL RECORD EW OF Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Navy Reserve on 15 June 2009. ceviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07791-00

    Original file (07791-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He obtained the fitness report on 5 November 2000. states he was honorably discharged at the expiration of enlistment, as extended, on 6 November 2000. If The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to his further service and crediting of drills. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. he was not discharged became...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09961-08

    Original file (09961-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5993 14

    Original file (NR5993 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner received credit in payment ang in reserve points for a total of four reserve drills he attended on 21 and 26 November 2013. ‘The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Ms. McCain and Ms. Aldrich reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00703-09

    Original file (00703-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify Enlistment/Reenlistment document Armed Forces of the United States. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09170-09

    Original file (09170-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LEC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to funded travel to his Home of Selection, Seal Beach, Ca via his separation activity at Jacksonville, FL when he retired from active duty. Petitioner...