DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ORS
Docket No: 3198-11
16 May 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 April 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 29 November
1995. On 18 March 1996 you received nonjudicial punishment for
wrongful use of provoking and reproachful words, assault
consummated by a battery, and communicating a threat to kill
another Sailor.
On 9 April 1996 an administrative discharge board recommended
that you be separated from the Navy with a discharge other than
honorable by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a
serious offense. After review by the discharge authority, the
recommendation for separation was modified, and on 23 May 1996
you were separated with a general discharge and assigned a
reentry code of RE-4.
The Board carefully considered your contention to the effect that
your reentry code should be corrected since it was assigned
because of one isolated incident. The Board concluded, however,
that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when
an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, there is no
TOYOSeATC sATIANOSXy But qoOW
NYATY ‘qd Lagdoa
‘ATeasouts
by:
eet ep Me
‘gotqysnCut 20 Z0zz%98 [eTzEe7eUW atqeqord
au eqeazqsuouep of JueoT{Tdde seyq uo st Usepanqd ey ‘prodea
Teaeu [etToOTJJO ue Jo uotyoer109 e A0F putdtdde ueym ‘ATjuenbesucpD
‘spzooer TeTOTIJO [Te OF seyoeqe Aqtze[nbeaz jo uotjdwnseazd
e yeu putw ut deay oF queqzodwt st it ‘pzebext styq UL
"paeog eya Aq perzeptTsuoo ATsnotaerd jou zeqqew rey Jo TO soUSepTAS
Tetzreqew pue meu jo uoTsstuqns uodn uotstosep s4Tt AZeptsucoet preog
eu} SAeY OF PeTATIUe ere NnoR ‘“Uayey eq Jouued uot oe aTqQerzoaey
qeyq yons ere eseo anoA jo ssoueqsumoato eya 7eU4 peqqezbeaz st aI
-qasenbex uodn peystuzny eq [TTT Teued eyq Fo
gzoquieu ey JO seqOA pue soweu syuL “petuep useq sey uotjeotTdde
ano& ‘'ATButpzosoy ‘eseo anoA ut uoTADe sATIOSAIOO Aue t0jy stseq
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00384_Redacted
SNOIAald (ZA-da) 00 NV ‘£407-0 ANMOA OHAV ue }IUIgNS 0} 14311 OU) pue ‘JasuNod ynoyW MIM souRIesdde yeuosiod v 0} 1YSII ay) “‘preog ay) Jo UOTSIDap ay} Jo juRoTdde asiapy 1002-29102 GIN ‘dV SMAYGNV TrLp-0S 18L XL ‘dAV Hd TOGNVY YHOO aue ‘ONIM Az ‘Ad GNVWINOD sEst OF ALINS ‘LSAM LAAMLS O0ss aavod MAIATY ADAVHOSIG ADO YIV AUMINVAVS TIDNN0D TANNOS 84d ADAOd UV AHL 4O AMVLANIAS 1WOUd OL ‘ysonbar s jueordde ayy ye yuvordde oy} 0} ojqeyTeae opeul aq [JIM SoJ0A pue soweN "UNOGAV 24} 0}...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05301-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 4 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08440-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that your RE-4 reentry code should not be changed due to your diagnosed visual condition which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1122 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. in this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. The RE-3C reentry code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04425-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01121-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 1121-11 31 October 2011 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The Board noted that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service,since an other than honorable discharge is normally assigned when an individual is found to have committed...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00333
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN- pe AB oe PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON ) “GEN 7 UOTHC OTHER DENY , x fr xX ii x ye x Qa: x ISSUES A93.1 9 INDEX NUMBER A67.1 0 - eS A92.37 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08083-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2011. On 27 June 1997, you received a general discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01357-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ application on 2 November 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00413
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. (Change Discharge to Honorable} ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. d. On or about 5 Apr 96, you failed to report for duty at the appointed time.