Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00384_Redacted
SNOIAald (ZA-da) 00 NV ‘£407-0 ANMOA OHAV

ue }IUIgNS 0} 14311 OU) pue ‘JasuNod ynoyW MIM souRIesdde yeuosiod v 0} 1YSII ay) “‘preog ay) Jo UOTSIDap ay} Jo juRoTdde asiapy

 
 
   

1002-29102 GIN ‘dV SMAYGNV TrLp-0S 18L XL ‘dAV Hd TOGNVY
YHOO aue ‘ONIM Az ‘Ad GNVWINOD sEst OF ALINS ‘LSAM LAAMLS O0ss
aavod MAIATY ADAVHOSIG ADO YIV AUMINVAVS
TIDNN0D TANNOS 84d ADAOd UV AHL 4O AMVLANIAS

1WOUd OL

 

‘ysonbar s jueordde ayy ye yuvordde oy} 0} ojqeyTeae opeul aq [JIM SoJ0A pue soweN

"UNOGAV 24} 0} uoreor|dde

‘J'q ‘UOIuIYse A Ul preoy asea

uy IVNOLLY TwNOISIOGa §.dvOH AHL ONY agssIs. LNVOITIG
$8£00-8007-C4 0T0z das +z

  

YgdaWAN ASVD aLVd ONIMAVSH

 

ONTAVAH SONVAVAddV TVNOSUdd JO ONIGUOOdS AdVL

 

HONVAVdddV TVNOSUAd
dO ANIL LV CALLINGNS SLIGIHXd TVNOLLIGGV

 

davod SHL OL ASVATAY S$. TASNNOD

 

Aid TINNOSUad JO dana
NOLLVOIILON dO YALLAT

 

ADAVHDOSIC JO MAIATY WOd NOILVOITdd¥

 

 

 

 

   
 
 

oe

| inion

davod AHL ONILNIOddV YACUO

UL me 00°99V

 

 

  

wasdWON XAGNI SO'r6V SANssi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YHHLO OHLON NAD NOH

 

 

 

TASNNOD AO NOILVZINVD8O YO GNV ssauadv

 

 

MAIAdY GaOoda

 

 

 

 

a av

NVSS/NSAV aavao (IVLLINI YIGGUA LSA “LSVT) YAGWGW TOIAMS AO GIAVN
quoOoad ONRIVA GUVOd MAIATY AOUVHOSIC FOUOA ULV
jog sjourmexq
‘quoUTORNV

‘posueyoun UIVUIOI pNoYs sB1eYSsIp oy} SoUTULLIO}Op puL odIeYOSIp Jo spersdn
JOF siseq s[qeynbe 10 [eso] OU S}STXd S19q} EY} SOpN]oUod JoYyLINy preog sj ‘ssUIpUTT SULOBdI0J 9y} JO MOTA U]

‘ssoooid onp sayensrutupe [ny popraoid sem jueorfdde oy} pue Ayoyne adseyosip
dy} JO UONSIOSIP oy} UIJIM sem puL UONENSaI sBIeyosIp oy) JO syewioIMbes sayuL}sqns pue [empoooid
OY} YIM JUSISISUOD SVM JBILYSIP oY} Jey} sopnfouUOd pleog MOIADY osIeydsIg 94], *

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03198-11

    Original file (03198-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was modified, and on 23 May 1996 you were separated with a general...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00464

    Original file (FD2006-00464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 1 1 1 1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRS'I' MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 GRADE 1 AFSNISSAN PERSONAL, APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COllNbEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRFSS A N 0 OR ORLANIZAI ION Ok COUNbLL TYl'h CEN coUNS'L YES I No X L..-..-....-..-..-.----------- ISSUES A92.21 A93.01 - - - - - Ih'DEY hll3lBER A66.00 1 IIIARINC DA I E EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 1 APPLICA'I'ION I'OK KBVIBW OI'...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14

    Original file (NR5899 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2008-00336

    Original file (FD-2008-00336.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date) AND AM COMPLETING THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES. LOR, dated 25 Jul 05 4, AF Form 3070, dated 23 May 06 5.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0436

    Original file (FD2002-0436.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    INDORSEMENT SAF/MIBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S: DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW. (EF-V2) EXHIBULS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 2 3. Attachment: Examiner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6468 14

    Original file (NR6468 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    { ) al r a) ¢ a Tm 6d \ > gus oO 4 t cd ie) ) i ) r AUT) oti C { QO -d C ay) ty 43 GS o S es b Docket No. Members who are retired are not eligible to cransfer your education benefits. The Board found that there was not revision to the Post-9/11 GI Bill law or policy in December 2009 as you claim.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00419

    Original file (FD2006-00419.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (No appeal) (No mitigation) e. Additional: LOR, 08 SEP 03 - Failure to report to duty at the appointed time. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. August 5,2006 Air Force Discharge Review Board SAFMIBR 550-C Street West, Suite 40 Randolph AFB, TX 78 150-4742 Dear Members of the Air Force Discharge Review Board, I am writing this letter to request and upgrade of an Administrative discharge, titled as Generawnder Honorable Conditioned Discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0464

    Original file (FD2001-0464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0464 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached, ‘The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. The Air...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00069

    Original file (FD01-00069.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE ~~ GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Basis for Action: The Commander, 20th Equipment Maintenance Squadron, has recommended that be separated from the service with a general discharge for a pattern of misconduct - conduct AB- prejudicial to the maintenance of good order and discipline, pursuant to AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.50.2. He is not a good candidate for P &...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0150

    Original file (FD2002-0150.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢7992-0150 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Scott AFB, IL on June 2, 2003. She was apprehended for possessing alcohol the day after she was issued a Letter of Reprimand.