DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REGORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 01818-12
29 June 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1S52 .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 June 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. Although you took the E-4 Navy -wide
advancement examination while on active duty in March 1985, you
were separated from active duty in June 1985, before the final
advancement results were released. In August 1985, you
reenlisted in the Naval Reserves, and on 23 September 1985, you
received a letter from the Bureau of Naval Personnel authorizing
advancement in the E-4/SK3 rating from the active duty
advancement examination. On 6 November 1985, you were
terminated from drilling reserve status for failure to maintain
satisfactory participation. Since you did not have your
commanding officer's recommendation to advance from the active
duty exam into the Reserves, you were therefore, not promoted to
B-4/SK3. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
\o Qu Pla
W. DEAN PF
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08005-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Upon further review, as provided in enclosure (1), and review of the member official service record_ was attach to the Selected Reserve Component as an SKSN/E3 and did participate in the February 2007 (Cycle 192) advancement examination and was selected for SK3/E4. Therefore, the member is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07133-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2008. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01411-00
doctor placed you in a temporary status of not physically qualified from status after that date. concluded that your medical history was sufficient to support a decision that you should not be reenlisted in the Naval Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03354-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,Cconsequently, whenf applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burderi is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06536-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAJAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 5 June 2001 6536-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the States Code section 1552. provisio:>s of Title 10 of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06265-98
advanced to SK3 (E-4) on 16 June 1977. enlistment, you completed an alcohol rehabilitation program. The performance evaluation for the period 19 On 11 September 1981 you were again counseled concerning your abuse of alcohol. days later your recommendation for advancement was formally withdrawn because of a lack of professional and military skills and alcohol abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03300-01
recommended for advancement, an RE-4 reenlistment code was the only code that could be assigned. differently than others released from active duty under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09858-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on.21 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code given your SCM conviction of serious...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01236-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 2 November 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. - Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...