Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03300-01
Original file (03300-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

ELP
Docket No. 3300-01
19 October 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
17 October 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

considered your application on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

and were ordered to active duty on 21 February
The record reflects that you extended your enlistment for

You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 23 December 1983 for six
years at age 21,
1984.
an additional period of 12 months on 23 June 1985.
You were
advanced to SN (E-3) and changed your rate to YNSN upon grad-
uation from YN  

"A" School on 21 November 1985.

You served without incident until 31 January 1987 when you
received an adverse enlisted performance evaluation
Adverse
marks of 2.8 were assigned in the rating categories of military
knowledge/performance, reliability, and human relations; and a
mark of 2.6 was assigned in rating knowledge/performance.
next performance
1988 showed some improvement, but was marginal.

evaluation for the period ending 31 January

Your

The record further reflects that you were not eligible for
reenlistment due to failure to meet the professional growth
criteria and were not recommended for advancement.

You were

honorably released from active duty on 20 February 1988,
transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.

You provide evidence that subsequent to your release from active
duty in the Navy, you served three years in the Army as an E-4.

To meet this criteria, and individual must be
(2) serving in pay grade E-3

Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria
for reenlistment.
(1) serving as a petty officer or,
having passed an examination for advancement to pay grade E-4,
and be currently recommended for advancement.
recommended for advancement, an RE-4 reenlistment code was the
only code that could be assigned.
differently than others released from active duty under similar
circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your
assigned reenlistment code.
Your subsequent service in the Army
does not compel the Board to change a correctly assigned
reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your
code was proper and no change is warranted.
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The Board concluded that the reenlistment

Since you were not

Since you were treated no

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01

    Original file (07934-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07384-01

    Original file (07384-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 and 10 days e. Petitioner then continued to serve without further However, on 19 November incident, receiving two performance evaluations, that assigned a satisfactory overall rating of 3.4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, 3R. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03429-09

    Original file (03429-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. If not, the individual must be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your period of Satisfactory service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09305-07

    Original file (09305-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 10 December 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 23. To satisfy professional growth criteria for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02930-02

    Original file (02930-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment (including first enlistment in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03837-10

    Original file (03837-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is authorized when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5398 13

    Original file (NR5398 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01181-10

    Original file (01181-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 June 1993, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2540-13

    Original file (NR2540-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code given your NJP, and the fact that you received a reentry code authorized by regulations.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06569-10

    Original file (06569-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 April 2004, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3, and assigned a reentry code of RE-3R.