DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No: 00412-11
17 May 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOE Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qi
Ref: (a) 10 Uv8S.€.. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS-812 of
18 Apr 11
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a correction to his service
record to reflect that she was advanced to E6/HM1 from the August
2009, Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messers. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
16 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No. 00412-11
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E6/HM1 from the August 2009, Navy-
wide Reserve advancement exam with an effective date of 16 June 2010, and
a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2010.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS III
Recorder Acting Recorder
SB. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
pease PD, Trew
ROBERT D. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
17 May 2011
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13824-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement should be back-dated to HM1/E-6 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01722-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 1722-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tos Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD qn Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a correction to his service record to reflect that he was advanced to E6/MM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10176-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04308-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the © applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the February 2007, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 9 August 2010 Wee W. DEAN PFE Executive Diradt DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06079-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate her E-6/YN1 Navy-wide advancement examinations and show that that her E-6/YN1 examinations from September 2008 through September 2010 be validated and receive PNA points to be applied to her March 2011 exam. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08287-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement to LS1/E6 should be backdated to the August 2008 (cycle 083) Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07085-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. In September 2010, with his final adjudicated clearance, he participated in the E6/AE1 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected and advanced with an effective date of 16 June 2011. j. Petitioner has applied to this Board seeking to have his E6/AE1 advancement exams validated retroactively for PNA points to apply toward his September 2009 advancement exam. NPC and CNO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06780-11
g. In September 2010, Petitioner again participated in the E6/AZ1 advancement exam. Apparently, neither Petitioner, her command, nor NPC were aware that she was ineligible to participate in the exam cycles. Therefore, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to validate Petitioner’s E-6/AZ1 advancement examinations from the relevant cycles and Petitioner should be advanced from the September 2010 exam cycle.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4583-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and ; injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...