DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 10656-10
1 February 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0F Qi.
Ref: (a) £0 U.s.€. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS-812 of
11 Jan ii
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to
E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement
examination.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
Docket No. 10656-10
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009,
Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination with the effective date of
16 April 2010 with a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2010.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS III
Recorder Acting Recorder
Sx Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
tTee_W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
1 February 2011
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13824-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement should be back-dated to HM1/E-6 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10176-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00412-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 00412-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOE Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qi Ref: (a) 10 Uv8S.€.. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS-812 of 18 Apr 11 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4583-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and ; injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04308-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the © applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the February 2007, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 9 August 2010 Wee W. DEAN PFE Executive Diradt DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10656 11
Under BUPERINST 1430.16F, (Advancement Manual for Enlisted Personnel of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Navy Reserve), all personnel designated in certain ratings, including Petitioner’s rating, “must maintain, as a minimum, continuous security clearance eligibility.” This provision has been interpreted by NPC to mean that, in order to be eligible to participate in an advancement cycle, take an advancement exam or advance to the next highest grade, a Sailor in one of the designated ratings must hold...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00424-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03710-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he advanced to E-6/CTI1 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03118-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/ET2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03329-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she advanced to E-6/LS1 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 June 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...