DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 08287-09
4 January 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO siamese
ed
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1430 PERS 812 of 23 Nov 09
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that Petitioner's advancement to LS1/E6 should be backdated to
the August 2008 (cycle 083) Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
14 December 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No. 08287-09
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriates, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to LS1/E6 effective 16 March 2009 with a
Time in Rate date of 1 January 2009.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c} of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)} it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
Matter.
ROBERT D. Z2SALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, I
Recorder Acting Recorder
5.. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
{32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compiiance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
4 January 2010 \x ; a
W. DEAN PFE
, Executive D or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR614 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to LS1/E6 from the August 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03329-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she advanced to E-6/LS1 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 June 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10548-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement to EM1/E6 should be backdated from the March 2008 (cycle 199) Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01722-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 1722-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tos Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD qn Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a correction to his service record to reflect that he was advanced to E6/MM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00412-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 00412-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOE Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qi Ref: (a) 10 Uv8S.€.. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS-812 of 18 Apr 11 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00307-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the March 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10213-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's should be advanced to CTM2/E5 from the September 2008 (cycle 200) Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10825-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MT2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10445-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navai record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to MM3/E-4 on 4 December 2008 vice 4 April 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsaiman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09121-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was awarded passed but not advanced (PNA) points for the September 2007 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...