Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04308-10
Original file (04308-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 04308-10
9 August 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS 812 of
9 Jul i060

(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the ©
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to
E-6/HM1 from the February 2007, Navy-wide Reserve advancement
examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 August 2010
and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants

favorable action.
CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No. 04308-10
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the February 2007, Navy-
wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16 December 2007,
and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2007.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)} it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

matter.
rT
ROBERT D. “SALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

9 August 2010 Wee

W. DEAN PFE
Executive Diradt
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 06012-10
6 August 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ’ Si ____ yy

Ref: {a} 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/376 of 8
Jui 10 ,

(3) Subject’s naval record

‘1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to
E-5/EO0D2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 August 2010
and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No. 06012-10
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/EOD2 from the September 2009,
Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16 June 2010,
and a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2010.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZS5ALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS IIT
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

Rad we

Fe, W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

6 August 2010

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10656-10

    Original file (10656-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00412-11

    Original file (00412-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 00412-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOE Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qi Ref: (a) 10 Uv8S.€.. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS-812 of 18 Apr 11 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4583-13

    Original file (NR4583-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and ; injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10176-10

    Original file (10176-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13824-10

    Original file (13824-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement should be back-dated to HM1/E-6 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00424-11

    Original file (00424-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08333-09

    Original file (08333-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/MM3, from the September 2007 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, “salman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04251-10

    Original file (04251-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-6/YN1 from the February 2008, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 August 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02303-11

    Original file (02303-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he advanced to E-5/BM2 from the March 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06892-10

    Original file (06892-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a back dated advancement to E-5/IT2 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23...