Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00004-11
Original file (00004-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
|

2 NAVY ANNEX
|

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DIC

Docket No. 4-11
1 Nov 11 |

 

our application for correction of your naval
f 10 USC 1552.

This is in reference to y
record pursuant to the provisions o

for Correction of Naval Records,

sidered your application on
f error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board
sitting in executive session, con

31 October 2011. Your allegations o
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures

applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and

applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 13 Sep 11,

a copy of which is attached.

us consideration of the entire record,
ence submitted was insufficient to
able material error or injustice.
tantially concurred with the comments

Accordingly, your application has
he members of the panel will be

After careful and conscientio
the Board found that the evid
establish the existence of prob
this connection, the Board subs
contained in the advisory opinion.
been denied. The names and votes of t

furnished upon request.

In

It is regretted that the circumstance
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\p DEAN PF F
Cc

Executive Di

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05081-03

    Original file (05081-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner was E-4 (frock to Second Class Petty Officer) for pay purposes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03577-99

    Original file (03577-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02038-02

    Original file (02038-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In view of the above facts, there is no basis for expungement of his military record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09933-02

    Original file (09933-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03U0564 8 Aug 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR case...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03715-99

    Original file (03715-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00004-01

    Original file (00004-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The actual reenlistment request for 36 months supports these documents as well.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02898-99

    Original file (02898-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~130~1/132-99 19 JUL 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN USNR, Encl : BCNR File # 02898-99 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny Seaman...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07664-98

    Original file (07664-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~ 1 3 0D1/ 148-99 11 AUG 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF - NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File # 07664-98 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny receive an Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03

    Original file (05106-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.