DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 13591-10
29 March 2011
This is in reference to your application for c
orrection of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
Board for Correction of Naval Records,
considered your application on
29 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered
information furnished by Naval Personnel Command (NEC) .
A three-member panel of the
sitting in executive session,
ideration of the entire record,
bmitted was insufficient to
1 error or injustice. The
After careful and conscientious cons
the Board found that the evidence su
establish the existence of probable materia
Board determined that your Performance Mark Averages (PMAs) for Cycles
200 and 203 were calculated correctly and no change to them is
warranted. Regarding Cycle 199, the Board determined that a change to
your PMA, as requested, would only have resulted in an additional .5
"passed but not advanced" (PNA) points. The additional .5 PNA points
would not have raised your final multiple score (FMS) sufficiently to
have resulted in an advancement in any of the succeeding cycles. Your
final multiple, even as adjusted, is still below the multiple required
to advance. Moreover, any additional PNA points for cycle 199 to
which you should have been entitled from cycle 199 are no longer
relevant after cycle 208. Only the prior 5 cycles of PNA points are
used to calculate a FMS. Under these circumstances, the Board found
that no relief is warranted. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\rematthe
W. DEAN PFECHRF
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05
9732-05 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07391-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/536 of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05624-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llAl/394, 11 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06371-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command (NPC), which advises that although your Performance Mark Average (PMA) was incorrectly scored, (you were authorized 102.8 points instead of 74 points towards your Final Multiple (FM) in September 2006), you still did not meet the minimum required score for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02628-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum tc reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.