Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05
Original file (09732-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00


 LCC
 Docket No. 9732-05
8 Mar 06








This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llE9/096, 8 February 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

W.       DEAN P FEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                             MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000


                                    1430
                                                                                           Ser 481lE9/ 096
                                                                                          8 Feb 06
MEMOR ANDUM FOR CONGRESSIONAL MATTERS (PERS—3lc)
Subj:    COMMENTS AND ECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF
- ~ —

 Ref:     (a) BUPERSINST l 43 0.16E
End:     (1) BCNR file #09732—05
1.       Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following comments.
2.       is requ esting a Performance Mark Average (PMA) correctly on his Cycle 183 Navy-wide Advancement Examination (E) and to credit his Cycle 183 Pass-Not-Advanced (PNA) points to his Cycle 188 Navy-wide Advancement Examination (NWE).
3.       After considering all evaluation reports for the inclusive period for Cycle 183 PMA computation (01 March 2001 to 28 February 2004), member’s PMA is determined to be 3.73 and it would credit him a Final Multiple Score (FMS) of 175.69 against Minimu~ Multiple Re~ired (~) of 216.68. He would earn no PNA point for PMA and 0.5 PNA point for the exam score for a total of 0.5 PNA points earned for Cycle 183 ~E. Succeeding exam FMS were recalculated and member’s adjusted FNS will all be still short of each cycle’s Minim~ Multiple Required (Cycle 184 192.34 1218.89], Cycle 187 199.92 [212.013, and Cycle 188 205.66 [206.98]). This Cycle 183 0.5 PNA points has been coordinated with NETPDTC staff for credit for future exam participation
4.       This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05

    Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05624-05

    Original file (05624-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llAl/394, 11 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09292-06

    Original file (09292-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48l1E9/746, 26 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07391-07

    Original file (07391-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/536 of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06

    Original file (05921-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7570 14

    Original file (NR7570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to a Performance Mark Average (PMA) score of 3.80 vice 3.73 for a Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) point of .5 for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ruskin and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05473-06

    Original file (05473-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08165-06

    Original file (08165-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 PER5-4812, 15 November 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14

    Original file (NR2970 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05689-06

    Original file (05689-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llE9/125, 9 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...