Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11165-10
Original file (11165-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BAN
Docket No: 11165-10
25 July 2011

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Titie 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 July 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice,

You had more than two years of prior honorable service in the
Navy, when you reenlisted on 6 April 1979, and served without
disciplinary incident, until 9 May 1979, when you received
nonjudicial punishment for failure to obey a lawful order and two
specifications of the wrongful use and possession of a controlled
substance (marijuana). However, on 1 February 1980, you were
separated with an honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment
code due to a physical disability which existed prior to entry.

In October 2010, you petitioned this Board to change your reason
for separation. However, your record and reason for separation
are presumed to be correct without any additional information to
the contrary.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and claim that you had medical injuries that occurred
during your first enlistment. However, you have not provided any
documentation listing the exact physical disability you were
separated for. Therefore, the Board does not know whether your
physical disability was one of your prior injuries, or a new
injury that was deemed to be pre-existing. Nevertheless, at this
time, the Board conciuded these factors were not sufficient to -
warrant a change to your reason for separation. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the cireumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Lo\ous

W. DEAN P
Executive Qirdéctor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05495-10

    Original file (05495-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and allegation that you have been denied veterans’ benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07179-10

    Original file (07179-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative ures applicable to the proceedings of this regulations and proced Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05764-10

    Original file (05764-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08057-98

    Original file (08057-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    to your accident, 21 June to 7 July and 20 July to 5 August 1978. The second NJP was for the two periods of UA prior The first was for two periods of Punishment On 15 December 1978, CMC directed your transfer to the Marine Corps Barracks at Camp Pendleton, CA for six months of limited duty. The record also reflects that you A $50 forfeiture was On 18 June 1979 a medical board found you unfit for full duty and opined that this status would not change with further treatment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00466-11

    Original file (00466-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. Its assignment in your case does not imply that you were released from jactive duty for medical reasons or that you were separated or retired ‘by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06608-10

    Original file (06608-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You reenlisted in the Navy on 15 July 1975 and served until 13 October 1970, when you were discharged by reason of physical disability because of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10618-10

    Original file (10618-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00388 12

    Original file (00388 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. In this regard, the Board found that on 12 March 2001, you certified that you had never used or possessed illegal drugs or mind altering substances except as prescribed by a licensed physician; you believed you had been recommended for re-affiliation/reenlistment at the expiration of your last period of service; and that you had prior service in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06985-10

    Original file (06985-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2011. You served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 19 August to 29 October 2002, when you were discharged for the convenience of the government by reason of a condition not a disability, with an uncharacterized entry level separation (ELS). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06922-10

    Original file (06922-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injueeiee.. You entered active duty in the Navy on 21 June 1995, and while in recruit training, you injured your back and sought medical help. Consequently, when applying...