Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01200-10
Original file (01200-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX 4
REC

WASHINGTON DC 20370 c ,
TO IC O37 5100 Docket No: 01200-10
4 November 2010

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 November 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 28 August 2008, and began a period of
active duty on 15 July 2009. During your initial processing at
the Military Entrance Processing Station, you claimed on the
report of medical history that you had three knee surgeries, but
had experienced no pain since. However, on 23 July 2009, a
medical evaluation was conducted and you documented that you had
right knee pain and swelling prior to commencing your active
duty, but failed to document that fact. On 30 July 2009, you
were notified of pending administrative separation action by
reason of failed medical and physical procurement standards due
to the instability of your right knee which was not disclosed
prior to your entry into the Navy. You were counseled regarding
your condition, and advised to seek treatment after separation.
Based on the medical evaluation, you were processed for
separation by reason of failed medical and physical procurement
Standards due to the instability of your right knee. You were
advised of your rights, and you elected to receive copies of
documents to be forwarded to the separation authority, but waived
all your other procedural rights. Subsequently, on 6 August
2009, you were discharged with an uncharacterized separation by
reason of failed medical/physical procurement standards. At that
time, you were assigned a reentry code of RE-4.

The Board in its review of your application, carefully weighted
all potential mitigating factors, such as your youth and your
desire to reenlist in the armed forces. The Board noted that
applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code to individuals who are separated due to a medical condition
that existed prior to entry into the service. The Board also
noted that accompanying your application, you made the statement
that prior to your enlistment you had knee surgery with no
complications and never had any knee problems since. The Board
thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your RE-4
reentry code. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

Sincerely,

\isaa

W. DEAN P
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600588

    Original file (ND0600588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Closing, the only request I make of the board is to allow me a second chance to serve my country, and to prove that I am capable, and can rise up and surpass the challenges I would be presented serving in the United States Armed Forces.” Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)Letter from E_ J. W_, MD, B_ Bone and Joint Clinic, dtd July 25, 2005 (2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05140-10

    Original file (05140-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 January 2010, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of failed medical and physical procurement standards due to the chronic pain which was not disclosed. Based on the medical evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of failed medical and physical procurement standards due to the chronic pain syndrome. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00655

    Original file (PD2009-00655.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI’s left knee instability was documented multiple times in his service treatment record (STR) and NARSUM and continued after he separated from service. It is not possible to separate out pain symptoms due to patellofemoral pain syndrome and pain symptoms due to Cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic. The Board considered the condition of Anxiety Disorder--NOS and unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13307-09

    Original file (13307-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. On 22 March 1994, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of defective enlistment and erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed instability of your right shoulder which was not disclosed prior to your entry into the Navy. Based on the medical evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of failed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00282

    Original file (PD-2014-00282.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01999

    Original file (BC-2011-01999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01999 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his entry-level separation with uncharacterized service to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02698

    Original file (PD-2013-02698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left knee pain due to degenerative joint disease [DJD]” and “right ankle pain due to degenerative joint disease”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, citing application of the DODI and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain due to DJD5009-500310%Left Knee Residuals, S/P ACL … 5003-526010%20090831Right Ankle Pain due to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01984

    Original file (PD-2014-01984.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board deliberated on if the CI’s degree of instability with additional meniscal signs of catching and pain with knee degeneration warranted a “severe” 30% rating under 5257, or dual knee rating with additional rating under 5259 for meniscal symptoms (catching and pain)that did not overlap with ACL instability symptoms (instability). The prior to separation VA exam documented normal hand findings. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10300-08

    Original file (10300-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 10300-08 12 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Sinisa REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01601-09

    Original file (01601-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr =i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1601-09 8 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qi OF NAVAL RECORD . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 19 May 2005. as ieee, and Ms. RB reviewed...