Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01601-09
Original file (01601-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
2. The Board, consisting of Mr =i

  

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS

Docket No: 1601-09
8 September 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 
   

Subj: FORMER Qi
OF NAVAL RECORD

. Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: {1} DD Form 149

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reentry code he was assigned on 19 May 2005.

 

as ieee, and Ms.
RB reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

“12 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that

the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows;

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 19 April 2605. On 10
May 2005 he was diagnosed with chronic knee pain. On 19 May.
2005, he received an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of his failure to meet medical/physical procurement
Standards and was assigned a reentry code of RE-4.

c. Applicable directives require the assignment of an RE-4
reentry code when a Sailor is discharged for failing to meet
medical/physical procurement standards. A Sailor who is found to
be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the
alternative, be separated by reason of erroneous entry and
assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4. At the time of
Petitioner’s discharge, a reentry code of RE-4 was required for a
diagnosis of chronic knee pain.
MAJORITY CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, a
majority of the Board, consisting of Mr. Morgan and Mr. Pfeiffer
concludes Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action. The
majority notes that Petitioner states he has had no further
problems with his knees. The majority believes that the reason
for discharge should be changed to erroneous entry since
Petitioner was unaware of the severity of his condition when he
was accepted for enlistment. Accordingly, the majority
recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to
erroneous entry.

The majority also concludes that an RE-3E reentry code should be
assigned since there ig no evidence that Petitioner had any
performance or disciplinary infractions during his period of
service and his record does not otherwise support the more
stigmatizing code of RE-~4.

MAJORITY RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on
19 May 2005 he received an entry level separation by reason of
erroneous entry and was assigned a reentry code of RE-3E.

 

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

MINORITY CONCLUSION:

The minority member of the Board, Ms. Mann, disagrees with the
majority. She believes that since there is no clear proof that
Petitioner’s knees are in good shape, he will fail again if given
another opportunity.

MINORITY RECOMMENDATION:

That no relief be granted.

4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D, 4SALMAN : ES KR. BXNICIOS

Recorder Acting Recorder
5. The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your

review and action.
lo ean

W. DEAN PPEIRFE

MAJORITY REPORT:
Reviewed and approved:

Robert T. Cali

Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
MINORITY PORT:
Review and approved:

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04373-09

    Original file (04373-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 10 October 2006. The Board, consisting of Messrs@ a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6-May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10061-08

    Original file (10061-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX HING NDC 20370-5100 WAS TO CRS Docket No: 10061-08 16 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER SN, USN,

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04752-07

    Original file (04752-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board, requesting a change in her RE-4 reenlistment code and reason for discharge (“Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards”)- 2. She was discharged with an entry level separation, assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, and a JFW separation code on 9 March 2006.f. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.c.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03974-09

    Original file (03974-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 27 December 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Sa ‘ Paeee and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegatiéms of error and injustice on 3 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06549-09

    Original file (06549-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS : 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRS Docket No: 6549-09 27 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD a, a a Ct

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05625-08

    Original file (05625-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 24 August 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Silberman, Bourgeois, and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the - available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10966-07

    Original file (10966-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. "\ijiililimg, and Messrs. WNR@lie and a: reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2008 and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that he was assigned an reentry code of RE- 3E on 16 December 2005. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09343-09

    Original file (09343-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 16 June 2009. 2 a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12993-10

    Original file (12993-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 18 July 2008. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Garst, and Mr. Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04814-09

    Original file (04814-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX HIN 70- WAS GTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 4814-09 15 Gune 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: FORMER qq me: REVIEW OF .NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Enel: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), -Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the basis for her...