Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00282
Original file (PD-2014-00282.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-00282
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20151015
SEPARATION DATE: 20071227


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-6, Journalist, medically separated for right knee instability. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “right knee septic arthritis and right ACL revision” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated his right knee condition as unfitting, rated 20%, c iting application of DoDI 1332.39. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: His condition continues to worsen and negatively impact his daily activities. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 2001003
 VA* - (~3 Months Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Instability … 5257 20% Right Knee Laxity 5257 20% 20080408
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 2
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80613 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .





ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted “a long and complicated history related to knee surgery.” He had previously undergone two right knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in 1993 and in 1995. He had a re-injury and underwent another ACL reconstruction/revision in July 2006, which developed infection requiring two additional arthroscopic procedures that resulted in septic arthritis (total of six surgeries, including partial synovectomy and debridement – last surgery in August 2006). “Since that time, he has had significant histories with pain control and therapy.” In September 2006 the CI fell and reinjured his knee while wearing his brace, and in January 2007 orthopedics requested additional physical therapy for a diagnosis of post-ACL patella-femoral pain syndrome. X-rays in June 2007 documented post-surgical changes and a small effusion. Prior magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) documented tricompartmental degenerative joint disease (DJD-arthritis).

At the MEB exam performed 4 months before separation, the CI reported constant pain with associated swelling, grinding, popping and giving way. Medications included narcotic and narcotic-like pain medication. The MEB physical exam documented range-of-motion (ROM) limited to 0-130 degrees (normal 0-140); “some” quadriceps atrophy [46 cm vs 50 cm on opposite side at mid-thigh]; II A Lachman’s (instability); positive pivot shift (for ACL laxity); positive patellar grind; joint line tenderness; and, 4+/5 ankle dorsiflexion (decreased strength) “limited slightly by pain.” Follow-up exam documented 4/5 strength with right knee extension attributed to deconditioning and pain. The CI had diminished sensation over the anterolateral (front, outside) aspect of his leg.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 3 months after separation, the CI reported right knee pain, instability, weakness, stiffness, giving way, locking (several times a year but less than monthly), repeated effusion, and severe flare-ups every 2-3 weeks. He reported episodes of dislocation or subluxation less than once a year. Physical examination revealed an antalgic gait with effusion, tenderness, instability, crepitus, grinding and painful motion. The anterior/posterior cruciate ligament instability was reported to be abnormal and assessed by the examiner as moderate instability. ROM was painful and limited to 0-132 degrees, without further decrease on repetition. There was diminished sensation in the right peroneal nerve distribution. Reflexes and strength testing were normal. Remote records indicated the CI underwent knee arthroscopic surgery in April 2009 (16 months after separation) and knee replacement surgery in April 2013 (over 5 years after separation).

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the PEB and VA rated the knee under code 5257 (knee, other impairment of: recurrent subluxation or lateral instability). The rating criteria that the Board deliberated were between the “moderate” (20%) and “severe” (30%) instability criteria. The Board also concurrently deliberated on application of dual ratings for the knee, based on separate ratings for instability and painful/limitation of motion. The remote VA evidence was not considered probative to rating at the time of separation. The CI had MRI evidence of DJD (arthritis; and later septic arthritis), and the VA exam and multiple treatment records documented pain-limited knee ROM as well as swelling and effusions. Members agreed that with consideration of VASRD §4.40 (functional loss), §4.59 (painful motion), and criteria of 5003, that coding under 5257 as moderate at 20%, in addition to coding under 5009-5260 (leg, limitation of flexion) painful motion/limited motion at 10% was warranted.

The Board additionally considered if the residual right leg decreased sensation warranted additional disability rating; but, members agreed that the requisite link of the neuropathy with functional impairment was not in evidence; therefore, the Board cannot support a recommendation for an additional disability rating for a peripheral nerve condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends dual disability ratings for the knee of 20% for the instability and 10% for the painful motion for the knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating the knee condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by this Board. In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual disability rating for the knee of; 20%, coded 5257; and 10%, coded 5009-5260, both IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be re-characterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Knee Instability … ACL Revision 5257 20%
Arthritis (Septic) / Degenerative Joint Disease 5009-5260 10%
COMBINED 30%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131218, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                 
         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         President
         DoD Physical Disability Board of Review








 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150016182 (PD201400282)

1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 30% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 30% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.



3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.


BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                               (Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02698

    Original file (PD-2013-02698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left knee pain due to degenerative joint disease [DJD]” and “right ankle pain due to degenerative joint disease”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, citing application of the DODI and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain due to DJD5009-500310%Left Knee Residuals, S/P ACL … 5003-526010%20090831Right Ankle Pain due to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00653

    Original file (PD-2014-00653.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. He also endorsed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00989

    Original file (PD2012-00989.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Right Knee Condition.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02254

    Original file (PD-2014-02254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition . However, although the CI reported that his knee frequently “gave out” at the C&P exam, there was no instability or laxity noted at the MEB or C&P exams and after separation rehab records...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00094

    Original file (PD2009-00094.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    If used, it would most likely be at the "Moderate" knee disability 20% level considering the totality of CI's knee exam and post-separation VA exam which demonstrated no worsening of CI's knee condition. In the matter of the Right Knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends separately coding the instability and painful motion of the CI's right knee with a rating of Chronic right knee instability s/p trauma, 5010-5257 at 20% and Right knee pain limited motion s/p trauma, 5010-5260 at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00930

    Original file (PD-2014-00930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain, Patellofemoral Syndrome, s/p Arthroscopy x25099-500310%Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee5260-500310%20110803 Internal Derangement, Left Knee5003-525730%20110803Other x0Other x1 RATING: 10%RATING: 40%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20120720(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Left Knee Pain . After review by a Decision Review Officer, the VA applied two different VASRD codes to the left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

    Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01937

    Original file (PD-2013-01937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the evidence reasonably supported pain limited motion for a disability rating of 10%; analogous to limitation of motion, coded 5299-5260.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee instabilityand 10% for the right knee limitation of motion for a combined 20% disability rating. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01904

    Original file (PD-2013-01904.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20040721VA* -(Based on Service Treatment Records[STR])ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Knee Pain5099-50100%S/P ACL Reconstruction, R Knee52570%STROther MEB/PEB Conditions x...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01460

    Original file (PD-2013-01460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition(s) . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...