Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08797-09
Original file (08797-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE
Docket No. 08797-09
7 June 2010

 

 

Phis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 June 1981. You were wounded
in the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, in 1983,
and sustained trauma to your head and lower extremities, a
performated eardrum, andamiidhearing loss. You completed a Report
of Medical History on 21 June 1985 dn which you disclosed a history
of lameness, swollen or painful joints, ear, nose or throat trouble,
head injury, bone, joint or other deformity, and foot trouble;
however, you denied having a history of frequent trouble sleeping,
depression or excessive worry, and nervous trouble of any sort. You
underwent a pre-separation physical examination on that date and were
found qualified for separation. The only significant defects noted
by the examining physician were high frequency hearing loss, warts,
and decreased range of motion in your right foot, none of which was
considered disqualifying for service or separation. You were
released from active duty on 25 June 1985 at the expiration of your
active obligated service. On 13 January 1986, the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you a 10% disability rating for
tendinitis of the right ankle and 0% for a history of perforation
of the tympanic membrane and high frequency hearing loss. On 9
August 1994 the VA added a rating of 10% for posttraumatic stress
disorder. On 20 April 2004 the VA increased the ratings for the ankle
condition and the posttraumatic stress disorder to 30% and 50%,
respectively.

Your receipt of a combined disability rating of 10% from the VA
shortly after you were released from active duty is not probative
of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record because
those ratings were assigned without regard to the issue of your
fitness for military duty on 25 June 1985. As noted above, you were
examined and found physically qualified for separation shortly
before you were released from active duty. There is no indication
in your naval record that you were suffering from posttraumatic
stress disorder or other significant mental disorder at that time,
or that your ankle condition and/or hearing loss rendered you unfit
for duty. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   

Executive D

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07721-09

    Original file (07721-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You had no military status during the period from 26 June 1979 to 19 December 1988. , The Board considered your application and all pertinent records in accordance with the provisions of SECNAV Instruction 5420.193, enclosure (1), Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (codified at 32 CFR 723), paragraph 3e. During the 1979-1989 period, you received treatment from VA health care providers for multiple conditions such as hip, back and knee pain, chronic recurrent foot pain,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09097-06

    Original file (09097-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served active duty in the US Army from 6 August 1985 to 21 November 1991,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00041

    Original file (PD2010-00041.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Orthopedic consultation on 3 October 2008 (six months pre-separation) noted calcaneal stress fracture and lateral ankle instability with medial impingement, however, no comprehensive examination or comment on range of motion was included. In the matter of the right ankle RSD, peroneal tendonitis, lateral instability of the right ankle and calcaneal stress fracture conditions the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03824-07

    Original file (03824-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2008. The VA denied your request for service connection for thirteen other claimed disabilities, to include posttraumatic stress disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010223

    Original file (20070010223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB determined the applicant's conditions rendered him unfit and afforded him a 10 percent disability evaluation and recommended he by discharged with severance pay. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. The Army...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00843

    Original file (PD-2013-00843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was subsequently medically evacuatedfrom theater for further evaluationforheat–related illness.At an internal medicine evaluation on 29 May 2003, the CI reported that a previous episode of heat stroke occurred in October 2002 while walking/running.At a neurological examination on 4 June 2003, the CIreported that the first heat-related episode while deployed was in early May after she was on guard duty. On the MEB DD Form 2807, dated 24 November 2003, the CI indicated she had anxiety,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00042

    Original file (PD2010-00042.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the posttraumatic headache condition unfitting, and rated it 10% IAW the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Posttraumatic Headaches . There is no evidence that the CI was on a profile for either of these mental diagnoses prior to separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11128-09

    Original file (11128-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    , The Board concluded that in view of your failure to disclose your pre-service history of posttraumatic stress disorder when you applied for enlistment, it would not be in the interest of justice to correct your record to show that you were retired by reason of physical disability due to posttraumatic stress disorder. In the Board’s opinion, the provisions of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations, part 4.129 (38CFR4.129) required VA rating officials to apply a convalescent rating, rather...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00543

    Original file (PD2009-00543.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB considered the case, and found him unfit for continued military service due to Chronic Achilles Tendinosis. As noted above, the CI underwent MEB/PEB, and the Right Achilles Tendinosis (coded 5284) was rated at 10% disability. Based on that evaluation, the VA assigned a rating of 10% for Traumatic Brain Injury with Headaches (coded 8045-8100), 10% for Cognitive Disorder with Sleep Disorder (coded 8045-9304), and 10% for Tinnitus (coded 6260).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00420

    Original file (PD2009-00420.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI, found unfit only for the PTSD condition, was determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The CI completed his deployment and on return to the States had increasing symptoms of TBI including headaches, cognitive defects and a diagnosis of PTSD. Regarding TBI as a possible new unfitting condition: As noted in the...