Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00307-09
Original file (00307-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 00307-09
20 April 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

     

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: {1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/134 of 26 Mar 09
(3) Subject'’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that Petitioner was advanced from the March 2007, Navy-wide
advancement exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
Docket No. 00307-09
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E6/STG1 from the March 2007, Navy-
wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16 December 2007, and
a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2007.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the

Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, VIII

Recorder Acting Recorder

5s Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured

compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.

20 April 2009 Send

eet DEAN IFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10433-08

    Original file (10433-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00280-09

    Original file (00280-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 00280-09 20 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: _ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD [CO

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07108-09

    Original file (07108-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAl from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08098-09

    Original file (08098-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/670 of 13 Oct 09 (3) Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced to E-4/DC3 from the March 2007 Navy~- wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06825-09

    Original file (06825-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant.to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of advancement to E-5/DC2 be backdated from the March 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01399-09

    Original file (01399-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/IT3, when first eligible in March 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06481-09

    Original file (06481-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B5/ND2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00938-09

    Original file (00938-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/MM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, ‘Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10

    Original file (00082-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12258-08

    Original file (12258-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They reason that although the command erred in allowing Petitioner to take the September 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam for I1T3, Petitioner was not eligible to take the exam per BUPERINST 1430.16F which states that...