DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 10213-0909
4 January 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Sub]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICo
Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
i2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/758 of 20 Nov 09
(3) Subject‘s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that Petitioner's should be advanced to CTM2/E5 from the
September 2008 (cycle 200) Navy-wide advancement exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
4 January 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
sorrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy. ,
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No, 10213-09
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows: ,
a. Petitioner was advanced to CTM2/E5 effective 16 June 2009 with a
Time in Rate date of 1 January 2009.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(¢)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, sf
Recorder ; Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{e)} and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
4 January 2010
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00938-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/MM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, ‘Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00970-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 00970-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL CORD Ref: (a) WO U.Ss€. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a correction to his service record to reflect that he was advanced to E5/CM2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement exam. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06481-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B5/ND2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03235-10
03235-10 13 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter’ referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM2/E5 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00772-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/SGT on 1 August 2003, prior to her separation from active duty on 24 August 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02032-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Lcc Docket No: 2032-10 9 Mar 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Qi REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08287-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement to LS1/E6 should be backdated to the August 2008 (cycle 083) Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00571-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/GM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12694-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM3/E-4 from the September 2008 Navy-wide cycle 200 advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10825-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MT2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...