DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SJN
Docket No: 07875-09
11 May 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 May 2010. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you began a period of active duty in the
Navy on 9 July 1990. The Board noted that the record reflects
that a recruit evaluation report states, in part, that you failed
to exhibit the attributes and skills necessary to successfully
complete basic training. The report further states you had poor
performance and had shown no concern for improving your attitude.
Subsequently, you were discharged with an entry level separation
by reason of failure to satisfactorily complete recruit training
on 14 September 1990. At that time, you were assigned a
reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are
separated due to entry level performance and conduct. The Board
thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your
reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Pic
ROBERT ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05768-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2012. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3954 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations allow the assignment of an RE-8 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05536-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12864-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00917-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted the psychological reports that you submitted with your application and the applicable regulations that require the assignment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05542-97
waiver for enlistment in July 1989 but also had five or more At this time you were recurrent episodes since that time. The medical report noted, in Your record On 14 June 1990 a medical board diagnosed you with recurrent herpes The board noted that a simples keratitis of the right eye. you were so separated and assigned an On 3 July 1990 RR-3P reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0442 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00941-10
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice: You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 25 July 2001. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to your RE-4 reenlistment code given your NUP and diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08277-98
Therefore, the entry level The Board also noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code Further, the Board concluded that since you submitted no evidence that you were incorrectly diagnosed as having a personality disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for your separation. thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11228-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...