DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SJN
Docket No: 5768-11
22 March 2012
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 March 2012. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
3 August 2010. The Board found that the record reflects that on
1 September 2010, you were diagnosed with asthma that existed
prior to your entry into the service. Subsequently, you were
discharged with an entry level separation by reason of “Failed
Medical/Physical Procurement Standards”. At that time, you were
assigned a waivable reentry code of RE-3Q.
The Board noted that applicable regulations allow the assignment
of an RE-3Q reentry code to individuals who are disqualified for
officer candidate training (not physically qualified for
appointment as an officer in the naval service), and the fact
that the medical condition existed prior to entry into the
service. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
injustice in your RE-3Q reentry code. In this regard, you were
assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your
circumstances. The RE-30 reentry code may not prohibit
reenlistment, but requires that a waiver be obtained from
recruiting personnel who are responsible for reviewing the
feasibility of satisfying the Navy’s personnel manning goals by
determining whether or not an individual meets the standards for
reenlistment. If you wish to reenlist, re-affiliate, or be
reinstated in the Navy, you should contact the Navy Recruiting
Command via your nearest recruiting facility. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\y Ruaon’
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Diredt8r
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11272 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You did not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability) reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code given the fact you were offered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04231-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3954 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations allow the assignment of an RE-8 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1668 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. A review of your medical prescreening documents revealed no record of you reporting the ankle injury or the history of suicidal thoughts...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00444-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2011. This condition existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08201-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show an RE-3 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. However, the doctor at recruit training recommended his separation because a waiver of his physical condition was required prior to enlistment. The Board further concludes that this Report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00601-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ‘ Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01427-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. If you wish to reenlist, re-affiliate, or be reinstated in the Marine Corps, you should contact the Marine Corps Recruiting Command via your nearest recruiting facility. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in the entry level separation or reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06935-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2011. The diagnosis of your knee condition was changed to chondromalacia patella (CMP), and you were recommended for discharge because knee pain which interfered with your ability to perform your duties as a recruit. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...