Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08277-98
Original file (08277-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

.

\‘

4

CRS
Docket No:
19 April 1999

8277-98

Dear"

_

This is in reference to your
correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.

application for reconsideration for

three:member  panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

A 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 April 199.9.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
of this
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the  
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

evidence,submitted  was

A psychiatric evaluation,

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 June 1990 at
age 17.
1990, found that you had an adjustment disorder and a personality
disorder.
separation by reason of
personality disorder".
reenlistment code of RE-4.

On 18 September 1990 you received an entry level
"other physical/mental conditions  
At that time you were -assigned a

conducted on 14 September

-

On 1 December 1992 this Board reviewed and denied your request to

change the reason for discharge and the RE-4 reenlistment code.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity, good service, family problems, and good postservice
conduct.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant an honorable discharge.
once again concluded that the reason for separation and
An entry level
reenlistment code were proper and appropriate.
separation is routinely assigned to individuals separated within

The Board also

the first 180 days of active duty.
separation was appropriate since you had served less than 180
days of active duty.

Therefore, the entry level

The Board also noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code

Further, the Board concluded that since you submitted no evidence
that you were incorrectly diagnosed as having a personality
disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for your
separation.
is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to
individuals separated due to diagnosed personality disorders. It
means that you may not reenlist in the Navy without prior
approval of the Commander, Navy Personnel Command.
thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your
reenlistment code.

The Board

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05357-02

    Original file (05357-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations state that an individual will normally receive an entry level separation during the first 180 days of continuous active military service or the first 180 days after a service break of more than 92 days of active service. You received an RE-3G reenlistment code, which is the most...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04259-06

    Original file (04259-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2037-0-5100TJRDocket No: 4259-0616 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of her discharge and changes in the narrative reason for separation and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00562-05

    Original file (00562-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 December 2004 the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to alcohol abuse. On 22 December 2004 you were so separated from the Navy, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11176-06

    Original file (11176-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 November 2002 at age 20. After review, a clinical psychologist...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08422-10

    Original file (08422-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2] June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04657-11

    Original file (04657-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02243-08

    Original file (02243-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given your diagnoses that resulted in discharge after about three months of active service and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the entry level separation or assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09116-03

    Original file (09116-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.ou enlisted in the Navy ~n 20 September 1999 at age 20. The Board noted that applicable regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06873-01

    Original file (06873-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2 0 0 2 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10531-06

    Original file (10531-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 January 2006 at age 19. Both release orders shows that you were...