Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01968-10
Original file (01968-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 26370-5100

JSR
Docket No. 1968-10
2 April 2010

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Commandant of the Marine Corps

AMENDED RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF EX-cWo2 ‘ae.

Qe. USMCR,

(1) Copy of BCNR ltr dtd 8 Mar 10 w/encl
(BCNR rept dtd 4 Mar 10 less encls)

 

1. Enclosure (1) was forwarded for your action.

2. HOMC has advised that Subject was discharged on 1 November
2009 on the basis of failures of selection by the FY 2009 and
2010 CWO3 Selection Boards. The Board was not aware of his FY
2009 failure or his discharge.

3. In order to ensure proper implementation, the Board’s report
at enclosure (1) is hereby amended to read as follows:

Subject line: Change “CWO2" to “EX-CWO2.”

Para 1. From the third sentence, beginning “He further
requested removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal
Year (FY) 2010 Reserve Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3)
Selection Board,” delete the following: “so as to be
considered by the selection board that next convened to
consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade
of CWO3 as an officer who has not failed of selection to that
grade.”

Para 1. Delete the last two sentences, which read as
follows: “He was eligible for consideration by the FY 2011
Reserve CWO3 Selection Board, convened on 17 February 2010.
In the event of his failure of selection by that promotion
board, he will be subject to action to effect his removal
from active status in the Marine Corps Reserve by reason of
having twice failed of selection to CWO3. and replace these
sentences with the following: “He also failed of selection
by the FY 2009 Reserve CWO3 Selection Board. He does not
contest this failure. Because of the two failures of
selection for promotion, he was discharged from

the Marine Corps Reserve on 1 November 2009.”

CONCLUSION: Delete the sentence “If he fails of selection
by the FY 2011 promotion board, the Board finds that
failure of selection should be removed as well, since it
must be removed to restore the status Petitioner enjoyed
before the FY 2010 promotion board as an officer who had
not failed of selection for promotion.”

RECOMMENDATION :

a. Revise to read as follows: “That Petitioner's
naval record be corrected by removing his failure of
selection by the FY 2010 Reserve CWO3 Selection Board,
leaving in his record his failure of selection by the
FY 2009 Reserve CWO3 Selection Board.”

b. Revise to read as follows: “That his record be
corrected further to show he was not discharged from
the Marine Corps Reserve on 1 November 2009, but
remained in an active status continuously after that
date; and that he be reinstated to active status
accordingly.”

4. The regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy
require that the naval record of Subject be corrected, where
appropriate, in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.

irom W. DEAN PFEIFFER

Copy to:
CWO2 Toole
f- 1 leg

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5106

oOSR:kes
Docket No. 015968-10
8 March 2016

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Commandant, United States Marine Corps

    

Subj: CHO? iin, USMCR , 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12160-09

    Original file (12160-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board did not consider her request for remedial consideration, as she has been selected and promoted to. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06730-11

    Original file (06730-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. 6730-11 4 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05747-10

    Original file (05747-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 11 October 2006 to 18 April 2007 (copy at Tab A). In enclosure (3), Petitioner also requested removing his failures of selection to chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 and 2010 CWO3 Selection Boards. Pursuant to the delegation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02255-10

    Original file (02255-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3) Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 cwo3 Selection Board, rather than the FY 2010 CWO3 Selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03811-10

    Original file (03811-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3) Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08569-09

    Original file (08569-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By enclosure (2), he amended his application, as it relates to the report for 1 May 2007 to 30 April 2008, to request that the report be modified, by removing section K (reviewing officer's marks and comments), rather than completely removed. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Fales and Grover, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11597-09

    Original file (11597-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Career Management Team has commented to the effect that Petitioner should have been ineligible for consideration by the FY 2008 Reserve Major Selection Board, convened on 23 January 2007, as he should have been placed on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00191-11

    Original file (00191-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2009 to 15 May 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. This request was not considered, as Petitioner may submit a request for a special selection board directly to the Secretary of the Navy, via HQMC {(MMPR-1), on the basis of the corrective actions in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08712-10

    Original file (08712-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to captain be adjusted from 1 June 2008 to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Captain Selection Board, rather than the FY 2009 Reserve Captain Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Sproul and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03806-10

    Original file (03806-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Siler and Messrs. Delorier and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 May 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The FY 2011 AR Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, which considered Petitioner with a corrected fitness report record but status as an officer who had failed of © selection to lieutenant colonel, selected him. ...