Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02804-08
Original file (02804-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BUG
Docket No: 2804-08
29 August 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

   

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: "ey ee eer ee
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: ‘(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 14 Mar 08 w/attachments
(2) MPP-35 memo dtd 29 Jul 08 w/enclosure
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board, in effect, that the

applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal
position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief
warrant officer 4 (CWO4) he would have been assigned had he been
selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY)
2006 CWO4 Selection Board, by which he was not considered, vice
the FY 2007 CWO4 Selection Board. He has a current date of rank

and effective date of 1 August 2007.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. McBride and

Shy, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on
28 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that

relief should be granted. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and

applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps Officer Plans Section has commented to
the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants
favorable action. This advisory opinion specifically recommends
adjusting Petitioner’s CWO4 date of rank and effective date to 1

December 2006.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the

following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, to show his date of rank and effective date in the
grade of CWO4 as 1 December 2006, vice 1 August 2007; and that
his lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with the
Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner’s naval record, and that
another copy of this report be returned to this Board, together
with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s
record, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such

purpose.

A, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was

present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Coma ¢ (Pree

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

 
   

W. DEAN
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10850-02

    Original file (10850-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 CWO4 Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 CWO4 Selection Board. After he had been...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10773-08

    Original file (10773-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LeBlanc and Wilcher and Mr. Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04138-08

    Original file (04138-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board, requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2009 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Ms....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07334-09

    Original file (07334-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01799-08

    Original file (01799-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 1799-08 16 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: iii REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01238-09

    Original file (01238-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 1238-09 5 June 200609 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10410-09

    Original file (10410-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 10410-09 12 February 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: _ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written _ application, enclosure (1), with this Board, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06915-06

    Original file (06915-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02108-06

    Original file (02108-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Reserve Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2007 Reserve Colonel Selection Board. Enclosure (5)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02007-06

    Original file (02007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 CWO3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2006 CWO3 Selection Board. They specifically...