Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03988-09
Original file (03988-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE
Docket No: 03988-0609
11 May 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7.May 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. :

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was.
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board did not accept
your contention to the effect that you sustained a shrapnel
wound while engaged in combat in Vietnam in May 1968. The fact
that the Veterans Administration awarded you a 0% disability
rating for a scar residual to a shrapnel wound of your left ieg.
effective 1 May “1970 was not considered not probative of the
existence or error or injustice in your record because the basis
for that award ig not shown in the available records, and the
report of your pre-separation physical examination dated 14
April 1970 does not indicate that you sustained a leg wound, or
that there was a scar on your left leg. Accordingly, your

application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

“It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

TR GN fo

ROBERT D
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05939-09

    Original file (05939-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested that your record be corrected to show that your right hand was wounded, rather than your left. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05157-99

    Original file (05157-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2000. Documentary ‘material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were wounded in action on 26 December 1968, and awarded the Purple Heart on 5 January 1969.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07263-02

    Original file (07263-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 1 November 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10416-02

    Original file (10416-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, and especially the repetitive and lengthy periods...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006023C070206

    Original file (20050006023C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Veterans Administration (VA) Request for Information, VA Rating Decision, and medical records. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00582

    Original file (PD2009-00582.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued Naval service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The VA did not find limited or painful motion on examinations. The VA rated his PTSD at 30%.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027226

    Original file (20100027226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 1 August 1969 in Vietnam *...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02476-98

    Original file (02476-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Veterans Affairs (DVA) indicates that there is nothing concerning treatment for wounds in your medical record. decision you submitted states as follows concerning your claim of being wounded in action: There is nothing in your service record to show that you A rating decision from the Department of The DVA rating The veteran was part of the Mobile Construction Battalion Three, which arrived in Vietnam in April of He worked at a rock crusher sight (sic) located 1967. in the bush somewhat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017652

    Original file (20140017652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that shows he was wounded in action or awarded the Purple Heart.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00658

    Original file (PD2010-00658.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Right Knee Condition. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.