Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02476-98
Original file (02476-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

TRG
Docket No:
14 April 1999

2476-98

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

panel. of the Board for Correction of Naval

A three-member  
Records, sitting in executive-session, considered your
application on 13 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you served in Vietnam as a member of Mobile
Construction Battalion Three., You claim that your unit came
under mortar fire from the enemy and that you received shrapnel
wounds.
were wounded in action.
Veterans Affairs (DVA) indicates that there is nothing concerning
treatment for wounds in your medical record.
decision you submitted states as follows concerning your claim of
being wounded in action:

There is nothing in your service record to show that you
A rating decision from the Department of

The DVA rating

The veteran was part of the Mobile Construction
Battalion Three, which arrived in Vietnam in April of
He worked at a rock crusher sight (sic) located
1967.
in the bush somewhat near Phu Bai.
tour at the rock crusher site, eventually leaving
Vietnam in February, 1968.
rock crusher site was mortared heavily by the
Vietnamese.
wounded in this attack.
wounds in the thigh and back,
as there were many more seriously wounded individuals
The veteran helped clean up the wounded
in the camp.

The veteran received shrapnel
but did not report them

Six Americans were killed and nine were

He spent his entire

On December 6, 1967, the

. 

and the dead bodies that resulted from the attack. . . . .
. Naval Mobile Construction Battalion Monthly Reports
. 
verify that there was a Vietnamese attack at the  rock
Although there are
crusher site on December 6, 1967.
no treatment records confirming the veterans' shrapnel
wounds, it is presumed that they were incurred during
this incident in service.

The DVA has granted you a 50% rating for Post Traumatic
Disorder and a rating of 0% for shrapnel wound scars on your back
and leg.

Stress

 

Concerning the Purple Heart the regulations in effect at the time
stated, in part, as follows:

. 

. Limitations.

. 
war, the wound for which the award is made must have
required treatment by a medical officer. . . .

- Except in the case of a prisoner of

the Board noted that there is no

In reaching its decision,
documentation in the record to show that you were wounded as a
result of enemy action or that you were treated by
The Board further noted that the battalion
medical personnel.
operation report apparently did not state that you were wounded
in action.
years to submit a request for the Purple Heart.
This delay means that other records which could have
substantiated your claim are no longer available.
concluded that the available evidence does not support the award
of the Purple Heart.
denied.
furnished upon request.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

Finally, the Board noted that you waited over 30

Accordingly, your application has been

The Board

Since there is no indication in your records that you were
injured under conditions which would qualify you for the Purple
Heart, regulations require that you obtain eyewitness statements.
The eyewitness statements can be from the medical personnel who
treated you or two other personnel who were present at the time
you were injured.
medical attention received,
a direct result of enemy action.

Statements should contain the time, place,

and verification that the injury was

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval

record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010478

    Original file (20100010478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following: * award of the Purple Heart * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge * award of the Combat Medical Badge * issue of two Bronze Star Medal certificates * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all his awards and decorations 2. With no published orders awarding him the Purple Heart filed in his military service record and no medical records showing the applicant's injury resulted from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019343

    Original file (20140019343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. (3) Thus, these three statements (that do not show any evidence of being eyewitness statements) provide insufficient evidence to support a claim to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014964

    Original file (20100014964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant received medical treatment on 11 February 1967 for a fragment wound to his right upper leg. f. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the applicant should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 27 January 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100635C070208

    Original file (2004100635C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the application date for this case is 29 December 2003, which is within the statute of limitations for the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant's service personnel records contain two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods 16 September 1964 to 12 December 1965 and 13 December 1965 to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01465

    Original file (BC-2005-01465.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH on 1 November 2005. Applicant’s personal statement is noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include his service medical records, we find no corroborative evidence to establish that he was treated for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action during a rocket attack on 28 February 1968. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012493

    Original file (20130012493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05362

    Original file (BC-2012-05362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05362 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he is entitled to the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. There is no evidence the applicant was in Vietnam during April 1968. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065824C070421

    Original file (2001065824C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002547

    Original file (20140002547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. Regrettably, in the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for awarding...