Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01809-09
Original file (01809-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket No. 01809-09
7 May 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

       

 

 

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 3 Mar 09 w/attachments
(2) PERS-913 memo dtd 10 Apr 09
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by amending the NAVPERS Form 1070/615 to
show his discharge from the Naval Reserve on 5 March 2005 was
"Honorable" rather than "Dishonorable," and that the
reenlistment recommendation was "Recommended" rather than "Not
Recommended." He also requested a new certificate of discharge.

 

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger and Messrs. Mann and
Trant, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 7 May 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel
Command office having cognizance over the subject matter of this
case commented to the efrect that Petitioner's record supported

no discharge characterization other than honorable. This
advisory opinion did not address Petitioner's request regarding
the reenlistment recommendation.

c. Petitioner submits his final enlisted performance
evaluation report for 16 November 2003 to 15 November 2004,

which is adverse but recommends retention.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds an error and injustice warranting partial relief,
specifically, change of the discharge characterization from
"Dishonorable" to "Honorable" and issuance of a corrected
certificate of discharge. The Board is unable to find the
recommendation against reenlistment was erroneous, noting the
adverse content of Petitioner’s final evaluation. In view of
the above, the Board directs the following limited corrective
action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by modifying
his NAVPERS Form 1070/615, page 2, to show "Type of Discharge"
as "Honorable" vice "Dishonorable."

b. That he be issued a new certificate of discharge
reflecting the corrected discharge type.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

e. That the remainder of Petitioner's request be denied.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

14

PUY aL ING sh GL

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
-announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02530-01

    Original file (02530-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMC Docket No: 02530-01 14 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: EX-50 REVIEW OF NAVAL RE Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing his NAVPERS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03433-08

    Original file (03433-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) to 0351 (infantry assaultman) ; removing the adverse fitness report for 15 September 2002 to 13 March 2003, a copy of which is at Tab A (enclosure (2) shows the Headquarters Marine Corps {(HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB} has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04206-09

    Original file (04206-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070})"} entry dated 27 July 2005 and her undated rebuttal. That her record be corrected further by removing the service record page 11 entry dated 24 October 2005. c. That her record be corrected further by modifying the service record page 11 entry dated 11 April 2005 by removing “This has been your second offense of search [sic] nature.” d. That any material or entries...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09

    Original file (00700-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11291-09

    Original file (11291-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 © (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 8 February 2007, a copy of which is in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Leeman and ,.Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2009, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09788-09

    Original file (09788-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosure (3), MMOA-4, the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, commented to the effect that Petitioner's failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should not be removed, notwithstanding the PERB action, in view of the noncompetitive cumulative relative values in his fitness reports as a major, as well as a fitness report date gap. Notwithstanding enclosure (3), the Board finds Petitioner’s failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should be removed as well. b, That his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03649-09

    Original file (03649-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the gervice record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 2 August 2007, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 2 August...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08954-09

    Original file (08954-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 17 January 2008 {two, concerning the January and February 2008 sergeant promotion periods) and 29 February 2008 (concerning the March 2008 sergeant promotion period) with his undated rebuttal. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11543-08

    Original file (11543-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 11543-08 9 March 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Enclosure (3) clarifies the basis for the recommendation to remove the weight control entry for 10 February 1993 to 4 October 1996 and the page lid entry dated 27 January 2003. That any material or entries inconsistent with...