Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11543-08
Original file (11543-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BUG
Docket No: 11543-08
9 March 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

   

Subj:

 

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 3 Nov 08 w/attachments

(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 14 Jan 09

(3) Memo for record 4 Mar 09

(4) Subject'’s naval record
i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his

naval record be corrected by modifying the Marine Corps Total
Force System (MCTFS) data by removing the weight control entries
for 10 February 1993 to 4 October 1996 and 5 December 2000 to

25 April 2001 (enclosure (2) of Petitioner’s application) and
the service record page lid (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")
entries dated 27 January 2003 and 27 July 2006 (page ll1d at
issue at enclosure (3) of Petitioner's application).

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. Grover and
McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on

5 March 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
limited relief should be granted. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Departinent of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps Manpower
Information Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems
Division (MIO) has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s
request warrants partial relief, specifically, removing the
weight control entry for 10 February 1993 to 4 October 1996 and
the page 1lld entry dated 27 January 2003 and modifying the page
lid entry dated 27 July 2006 by deleting the words “on two
separate occasions.” MIO specifically recommended that the
deletion be accomplished by drawing a line through the words to
be removed. Enclosure (3) clarifies the basis for the
recommendation to remove the weight control entry for 10
February 1993 to 4 October 1996 and the page lid entry dated 27
January 2003.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,

the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice
warranting the partial relief recommended in enclosure (2). In
this regard, the Board fully concurs with enclosure (2), except
the recommendation that the modification of the page 11d entry
dated 27 July 2006 be effected by drawing a line through the
words to be removed. The Board considers this an inadequate
method of correction, as the words to be removed would still be
legible, which could prejudice Petitioner. Regarding the weight
control entry for 5 December 2000 to 25 April 2001, the Board
was unable to accept Petitioner’s allegation he was not placed
on weight control. Concerning the page 11d entry dated 27 June
2006, the Board was unable to accept his allegation that his
weight/body fat measurements were improperly conducted. In view
of the above, the Board directs the following limited corrective
action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
from MCTFS the weight control entry for 10 February 1993 to
4 October 1996.

b. That his record be corrected further by removing the
service record page 1lld (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry
dated 27 January 2003. This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 11d on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.
c. That his record be corrected further by modifying the
service record page lld (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ”) entry
dated 27 July 2006 by deleting the words “on two separate
occasions.” This is to be accomplished by reconstructing the
page lld on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating
the words to be deleted so they cannot be read, rather than
merely lining through them.

ad. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

e. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

f. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Doni st J ARD

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723 .6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Sa
Fer W. DEAN PFEIFFER

Rxecutive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08

    Original file (12164-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07383-09

    Original file (07383-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) by removing the weight control entry dated 14 August 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06893-10

    Original file (06893-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed-enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 5 April to 31 December 2006 (denied on 20 March 2008, docket number 1029-08), 1 January to 31 December 2007, 1 January to 26 May 2008, 27 May to 30 June 2008, 1 July to 26 September 2008, 27 September to 31 December 2008, 1 January to 8 May 2009 and 9 May to 31...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09788-09

    Original file (09788-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosure (3), MMOA-4, the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, commented to the effect that Petitioner's failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should not be removed, notwithstanding the PERB action, in view of the noncompetitive cumulative relative values in his fitness reports as a major, as well as a fitness report date gap. Notwithstanding enclosure (3), the Board finds Petitioner’s failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should be removed as well. b, That his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12699-10

    Original file (12699-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing, from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS), his assignment to weight control from 7 January to 3 June 2000, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09450-08

    Original file (09450-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner also requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 August 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Prevatt and and Messrs. Bourgeois and Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03517-08

    Original file (03517-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 3517-08 19 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record...