Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12450-08
Original file (12450-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BOARD

 

SMS
Docket No: 12450-08

5 March 2009

 

gs in reference to ¥

This 1
naval record purs
United States Code,

uant to the provisio
section 1552.

£ the Board for corr

sitting in executive session, considered your
n 4 March 2009. Your allegations of error and
reviewed 4n accordance with administrative

rocedures applicable to the proceedings of
erial considered by the Board

together with all material

A three-member panel o

Records,
application Oo
injustice were

regulations and p
this Board. Documentary mat

consisted of your
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
ici In addition, the Board

regulations :
d by Headquarters Marine

ration of the entire
ce submitted was
e of probable material

In this regard, the Board substantially

error or injustice.
aned in the memorandum.
been denied. The names and

1 be furnished upon

ous conside

pplication has

accordingly, your a
£ the panel wil

votes of the members ©

request.

It is regr

that favorable ac
have the Board reconsider its decision up

and material evidence
by the Board. In this regard,

that a presumption of regularity 4
records. Consequently, when applyin

tant to kee

all official

ttaches to
f an

g for a correction ©
official nav
demonstrate
injustice.

Enclosure

al record, the burden 4s on the applicant to
the existence of probable material error or

Sincerely,

 
  
 

W. DEAN P
Executive D

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06363-08

    Original file (06363-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your © application on 20 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11625-08

    Original file (11625-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06673-09

    Original file (06673-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. For example, an FYO9 or FY10 0369 career Marine at zone ¢c who executes a reenlistment 31 days from the release of this MARADMIN will no longer...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06125-09

    Original file (06125-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    best) to “D.” oO A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8412-13

    Original file (NR8412-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, ' regulations, and policies. After careful and- conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence ‘submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05202-09

    Original file (05202-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06567-08

    Original file (06567-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2009. You would not have been entitled to disability separation or retirement even if you had been unfit for duty, because your discharge by reason of misconduct would have taken precedence over and precluded your referral to the disability evaluation system. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11197-08

    Original file (11197-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11666-08

    Original file (11666-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11695-09

    Original file (11695-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...