Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06363-08
Original file (06363-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

WJH
Dec. No. 6363-08
20 July 2009

 

Dear bie et ‘“ iT aa a

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
late husband's record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ©
application on 20 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC Casualty Assistance Branch memo of 26
June 2009, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence
submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of ©
probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the
Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. In 2001, Congress enacted Public Law 106-398
which authorized payment of back pay for former active duty
members who were unavailable to accept promotions because they
were interned as prisoners of war. The evidence shows that your
deceased husband was not on active duty when he was taken as a
prisoner in 1941. In 1977, Congress enacted Public Law 95-202
to provide Veteran's benefits to persons who rendered service to
tee United States during World War II. However, that statute
pertained to Veteran's benefits only (such as health benefits)
and not to active duty pay and allowances. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Doc. No. 6363-08

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

   

W. DEAN P
Executive Di

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11926-08

    Original file (11926-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09433-08

    Original file (09433-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2009. The Board found that you also certified on the DD 2656 that you were aware that your husband’s retired pay would stop when he dies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08663-07

    Original file (08663-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08663-07 22 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 19, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04079-01

    Original file (04079-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) allows Reservists with 20 qualifying years of service to leave a portion of their retired pay to their eligible survivors in the event they die before receiving retired pay at age 60. As noted in the USMC advisory opinion, recent legislation changed the RCSBP notification procedures, but this does not provide a basis for corrective action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05886-08

    Original file (05886-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06471-08

    Original file (06471-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identifies them as SBP participants and Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CO *

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04629-08

    Original file (04629-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, Executive Di Enclosure 16 Jun 08 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05742-08

    Original file (05742-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02945-08

    Original file (02945-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 september 2008. Sincerely, Enclosure 26 Aug 08 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C) Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO DOCKET NO. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct [ehh record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11253-07

    Original file (11253-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    11253-07 11 March 2008 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...