DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD :hd
Docket No. 11625-08
7 May 2009°
Dear #
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the ©
United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
retired grade be changed from lieutenant {pay grade 0O-3E) to
lieutenant commander (pay grade 0-4).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 May 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
24 March 2009 less enclosures, a copy of which is attached. The
Board also considered your letter dated 17 April 2009.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In light of your nonjudicial punishment,
the Board was unable to find your retirement as a lieutenant was
unwarranted. In view of the above, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel wili be
furnished upon request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that. favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PPREITEF
Executive D
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01445-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 20 April 2009 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustite.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08488-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 21 September 2009, a copy of which is attached. The advisory opinion, which recommends approving your request, says you met the requirements for promotion to lieutenant junior grade and that you accepted your appointment on 27 July 1956.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03625-10
Your request for investigation of the reporting Senior's actions was not considered, as the Board for Correction of Naval Records is not an investigative body. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2010. The Board also considered the NPC e-mail dated 3 September 2009 with attachment (DD Form 214), a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 20 August 2009 with enclosures, 30 October 2009 and 2 February 2010.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00285-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS , 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 2 February 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10693-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00685-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found your not having been selected for promotion to CW04 did not justify reversing its previous action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00427-01
df an official naval record, the burden is on the Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y NAVY Ml,LLlNGTON TN PERSONNEL.~OMMAND 38OSSOOOO 5720 INTEGRITY brilVE 5420 PERS-85 18 Apr 01 . ?WDUM FOR BCNR Via: Subj: Ref: BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator USNR , (a) USC (b) USC 10 Sec. Lieutenanptoonce placed on the promoted to Lieutenant with'a date of rank of 16 Apr 01 in accorddnce with ref the member is entitled to the grade of TDRL.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12202-09
You request promotion to lieutenant commander with an effective date of 24 July 2009. AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11456-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. application on 7 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12430-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 28 January 2010 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached, and your letter dated 19 May 2010 with enclosures. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...