DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
_ 2NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DIC |
Docket No. 11646-08
21 July 2009
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. Accounting and finance services for the
Department of the Navy are provided by the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS). DFAS has advised this Board that you
previously sold back 20 days of leave prior to 1 February 1998.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. If, after
reviewing all of your pay records prior to 1998 you still have
questions about your leave accounting, you may address them with
DFAS at the following address: Defense Finance and Accounting
. Service, 8899 East 56° Street, Dept 3300 (ATTN COR/Claims),
Indianapolis IN 46249-3300. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request... ©
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision, after exhausting your
administrative remedies with DFAS, upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Waa
W. DEAN ‘PF
Executive D x
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02919-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01922-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correc record to reflect that he did not terminate enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10865-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 10865-02 22 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08989-05
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memorandum 1070 JAM7 of 20 December 2005, and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), letter of 5 April 2006, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You requested an advisory opinion on Private(hereinafter “Applicant”)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03110-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02120-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 23 June 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02625-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Patitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred for travel to obtain the visa which was required for his spouse to travel to the States. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner‘s allegations of error and injustice on 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00666-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02827-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Public Law 105-85 enacted on 18 November 1997, authorized SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP participation during the one-year period beginning on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03075-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2011. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the United States Marine Corps letter 1760 MMSR-6K of 23 March 2011, and comments provided by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), copies of which are attached and were previously furnished to you. As part of your request, you submitted a “general power of attorney” and...