Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02827-09
Original file (02827-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

DUC
Docket No. 2827-09
14 July 2009

 

Dea eee

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on .

13 July 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 3 Jun 09, a
copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Lo dens

W. DEAN PFE i
Executive Dir oO

Enclosure
3 dun 09

 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

 

 

 

Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C)

   

BiG DOCKET NO. 02827-09

      

Ref; (a) BCNR memo of 12 May 03 .

Enel: (1) DD Form 2656-2, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
Termination Request

1. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct
einen, cecord to reflect that he declined participation in
the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2. The recommendation is based on the following:

a. Qe transferred to the Retired List on >
1 September 2007. He was automatically enrolled in the SBP as a
result of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Cleveland

Center (DFAS-CL} not receiving a valid SBP election.

b. Public Law 105-85 enacted on 18 November 1997, authorized
SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP participation
during the one-year period beginning on the second anniversary of
the date of commencement of receiving retired pay. ee,
can terminate his participation in the SBP during that one-year
period with his spouse’s written concurrence utilizing the

- enclosure.

3. Information regarding the SBP has been available to
pemmiiiittti_e, icon "Shift Colors", the quarterly newsletter
provided to all Navy retirees who maintain current correspondence
address information with the DFAS-CL. Though we make every
effort to provide favorable recommendations for the member and
his family, we also have a responsibility as stewards of the
Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1CO 3000/iGRRR
ia DOCKET NO. 02827-09

 

   

public trust. ses \Ouse has been protected since
his date of retirement under the SBP and had he died during that

period, his spouse would have received an SBP annuity.

YC

BASIL COLEMAN:

Deputy Director

Casualty Assistance Division
(N135C)

Acting

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11926-08

    Original file (11926-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07225-09

    Original file (07225-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Deputy Director Casualty Assistance Division (N135C) of 14 Sept 09, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00666-09

    Original file (00666-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05221-09

    Original file (05221-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No, 5221-09 9 September. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Public Law 105-85 enacted on 18 November 1997, authorized SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP participation during the one-year period beginning on.the second anniversary...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07863-06

    Original file (07863-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7863-06 4 January 2007This is in deference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06211-06

    Original file (06211-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6211-06 31 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. spouse has been...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11253-07

    Original file (11253-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    11253-07 11 March 2008 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10281-06

    Original file (10281-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10281-0631 January 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10520-07

    Original file (10520-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 7 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05742-08

    Original file (05742-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...