Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02120-09
Original file (02120-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .

 

SUN

Docket No: 02120-09
27 August 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
‘naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,. sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 August 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative —
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 23 June
2009, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

lo Nea’

W. DEAN PREIN
Executive Di

 
  

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
‘> QUANTICO, VA-22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO:

1800
MMSR-5
23 Jun 09

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Subj: BCNR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER STAFF SERGEANT

Ref: (a} Chairman BCNR ltr TRG:jdh Docket No: 02120-09 of
16 Mar 09

1. Per the reference, requests an advisory opinion on former.
oat 5 Per petition to adjust the point total on |.
anniversary years ending 31 October 1996,. 31 October 1997 and 31
October 1998. Adjustment of these years will aid former iia

@apenmmas i) is retirement from the United States Naval
Reserve.

 
 

 

2 . Former (ee WH asserts points were adjusted in the
anniversary years iisted in paragraph (1) with no justification
provided to him for the movement and cost him 2 satisfactory years
towards a reserve retirement.

3. Leave and Earnings Statements (LES) were ordered and received
from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Cleveland.
The documentation received was insufficient and did not aliow for
a proper accounting of former s_@iiiiil Wes service. This
Headquarters is therefore unable to confirm or deny former Staff

i Me assertion.

 

 

4. ‘Based on the above, this Headquarters recommends former Staff
Cm etN oe ition to move points not receive favorable

consideration.

5. Point, of contact is Major Fenton at (703) 784-9306.

4m Maree

HANSCOM
mead, Separation and
Retirement Branch
* By direction of the Commandant
‘e of the Marine Corps

os
< 1 m7

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01705-09

    Original file (01705-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05147-01

    Original file (05147-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust his Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR), Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD), date of rank as a captain, and Reserve retirement anniversary date to reflect service in the Air Force Reserve from 11 March 1999 to 25 October 2000. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10421-07

    Original file (10421-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02474-01

    Original file (02474-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, addition, the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04704-08

    Original file (04704-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed, and your rebuttal thereto dated 29 July 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As requested by the reference, we have audited your Career Retirement Credit Record (CRCR), enclosure (1), in order to establish your correct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05293-08

    Original file (05293-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06715-07

    Original file (06715-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01782-09

    Original file (01782-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 duly 2009, a copy of which is attached. A thorough review of = and the records at this Headquarters revealed tha ie served as a member of the reserves from May 18, 1988, to August 20, 1995...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08354-08

    Original file (08354-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04894-09

    Original file (04894-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 4894-09 13 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ia, REVIEW OF NAVAL ORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 Apr 09 2) HQOMC MMMSR-5 memo dtd 23 Jun 09 w/enele (3) Subj’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed...