Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08169-07
Original file (08169-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASH
INGT0N DC 20370-5100



HD:hd
Docket No. 08169-07
27 January 2008



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory Opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 25 October 2007, a copy of which is attached. The Board also Considered your letter dated 30 November 2007 with reference (b).

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.











It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


Sincerely,




                           W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure




























DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                             MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
                                            
                                   
5420
                                                                                          PERS—80/1005
                                                                                         
25 Oct 07

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:     Assistant for ECNR Matters (PERS—31c)

Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND R ECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF


Ref:     (a) U.S. C o de Title 10

En cl :    (1) BCNR File 08169-07

1.       Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval of
to have his date of rank adjusted to 01 February 2001.



returned to active duty in accordance
with reference (a). The date of rank, 24 January 2006,   date of rank to the active duty list in the regular grade held by him when his name was placed on the temporary disability retired list. Since the member’s qualifications as a 1520 were not current, the date of rank was adjusted to allow the member time before he would become eligible for a selection board.
        


         3.       Recommend disapproval   




Director, Officer Career
Progression Department
(PERS-80)
LEPP

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00685-07

    Original file (00685-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found your not having been selected for promotion to CW04 did not justify reversing its previous action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00292-07

    Original file (00292-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested that your lieutenant commander date of rank and effective date be adjusted to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06 Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer Lieutenant Commander Selection Board, vice FY 07.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 February 2007 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09763-07

    Original file (09763-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been promoted to that grade from the Fiscal Year (FY) O07 Active Duty Lieutenant All Fully Qualified Officer List (AFQOL), vice the FY 08 AFQOL (he missed consideration for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06

    Original file (09248-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08005-07

    Original file (08005-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Upon further review, as provided in enclosure (1), and review of the member official service record_ was attach to the Selected Reserve Component as an SKSN/E3 and did participate in the February 2007 (Cycle 192) advancement examination and was selected for SK3/E4. Therefore, the member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10951-07

    Original file (10951-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You also impliedly requested setting aside your discharge from the Navy Reserve on 1 February 2008 by reason of your having had at least two failures of selection to lieutenant commander.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11022-07

    Original file (11022-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to lieutenant as 1 September 2007, vice 1 October 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Dietrich and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 June 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10796-07

    Original file (10796-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/335 dtd 28 Apr 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03970-07

    Original file (03970-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1000 BUPERS 325 dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07

    Original file (09999-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...