Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06263-08
Original file (06263-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG

Docket No: 6263-08
24 September 2008

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 September 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

. DEAN PFI
Executive Dia or

 

es

 

 

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO:
1800

MMSR-5
5 Aug 08

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THI

 

GY

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

 

 

 

 

 

    
 
 

Subj: BCNR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF MASTER GUNNERY
_USMCR
Ref: (a) Chairman BCNR ltr TRG:jdh Docket No: 06263-08 of
28 Jul 08
Encl: (1) Career Retirement Credit Record

 

1. The reference requests an advisory opinion on Master Gunnery
sergeant MiB oc tion to correct his record to show the

anniversary year beginning on 23 February 1992 as creditable
towards retirement.

2. Per the enclosure, Master Gunnery Sergeant M2: 22
satisfactory anniversary years that are creditable towards a
reserve retirement. The movement, or non-movement, of points will
not affect his ability to earn a reserve retirement nor will it
affect any reserve pay entitlements.

3. Based on the above, this Headquarters recommends Master

Gunnery Sergeant gimme t ition not receive favorable
consideration.

4. Point of contact is Major wr (703) 784-9306.

    
 

   
      

 

Deputy : ‘Separation and
Retirement Branch

By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08397-08

    Original file (08397-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters Marine Corps, a Copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01705-09

    Original file (01705-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06219-07

    Original file (06219-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05293-08

    Original file (05293-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10421-07

    Original file (10421-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06756-98

    Original file (06756-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Retirement Policy which states that Marines in the grade of Gunnery Sergeant or above, must serve two years in their current pay grade prior to transfer to retirement status. 6756-98 Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery 1. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery Sergeant petition with regard to his retirement rank.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08354-08

    Original file (08354-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04704-08

    Original file (04704-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed, and your rebuttal thereto dated 29 July 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As requested by the reference, we have audited your Career Retirement Credit Record (CRCR), enclosure (1), in order to establish your correct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04092-03

    Original file (04092-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02120-09

    Original file (02120-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 23 June 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.