DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 4092-03
10 September 2003
Your allegations of error and
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 September 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this connection the Board substantially
The names and
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PF
Executive Di
Enclosure
DEPARlWENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3260 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
22134-S 10
’
’
3
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1821
MMSR-5
15 Ju l
03
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
ADVISORY OPINION ON
Ref:
Encl:
(a) Chairman BCNR ltr TRG:jdh/Doc NO: 04092-03 of 11
Jul 03
(1) Career Retirement Credit Record
request to redistribute points from one
1 . We have been asked to provide an advisory opinion on Gunnery
Sergeant
anniversary year to make another anniversary year qualifying for
retirement.
Sergeant
Retirement Credit Record (CRCR) indicates that he will have earned
19 qualifying years of service on 9 April 2004 and will be able to
complete
20 qualifying years before his current contract expires on
8 June 2005.
reccmmend that the Board disapprove Gunnery
As shown at the enclosure, his Career
" request.
We
further questions please feel free to contact
at 1 800 336-4649.
and Retirement Branch
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06263-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06756-98
Retirement Policy which states that Marines in the grade of Gunnery Sergeant or above, must serve two years in their current pay grade prior to transfer to retirement status. 6756-98 Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery 1. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery Sergeant petition with regard to his retirement rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00747-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Gunnery Sergeant transferred to the Fleet Marine Corps (FMCR) on 31 December 2000 mandated by the provisions of (b), 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01401-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was transferred to the Marine Corps Retired Reserve vice discharged on 28 February 1994. e. Although the advisory opinion in this case recommends relief be denied, the Board is aware that the Commandant of the Marine Corps has routinely moved points, as a corrective action, to satisfy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04455-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. During this period, - was credited with three qualifying years of service in his Marine Corps Career...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02661-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The reference requests an advisory opinion on Lieutenantto correct his record to show the anniversary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03163-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5109 TRG Docket No: 3163-09 25 June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF me Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his records be corrected to show that he had participation in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04704-08
In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed, and your rebuttal thereto dated 29 July 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As requested by the reference, we have audited your Career Retirement Credit Record (CRCR), enclosure (1), in order to establish your correct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04434-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...