DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DJC
Docket No. 5372-08
12 August 2008
Dear (Te.
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
11 August 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1430 Ser 811/485
dtd 3 Jul 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. [In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
oa Sebi
W. DEAN PF
Executive Divyestor
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
’ 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
, MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1430
Ser 811/485
03 Jul 08
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via: PERS-31¢c
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO
Refi: (a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 28 Apr 08
(b) OPNAVINST 1150.8A
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner is requesting his 4 year SRB reenlistment be
recomputed so the 24 months inoperative extension will not be deducted
from his SRB.
3. Reference (b) requires that any member may cancel up to 24 months
of extension as long as member reenlists at least two years day for
day beyond the extension. The member’s EAOS was 21 September 2008
with a SEOAS of 21 September 2010. ‘The 4 year reenlistment on 31
January 2008 did not meet that criterion.
4, In view of the above, recommend member's record remains as is.
5. Recommend member submits an application to BCNR at original EAOS
to change his reenlistment date to 21 September 2008 for four years.
6. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the
Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.
a i
TI en
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01356-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This memorandum updates reference {d).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05561-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/395 dtd 21 Aug 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04871-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08932-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The petitioner reenlisted for four years on 07 May 2007.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05862-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06787-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/547 dtd 28 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 02 October 2000 and received a zone ‘B” SRB incentive. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07133-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2008. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05110-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive-the The petitioner ‘C" SRB reenlistment.